Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24040300›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

In vitro screening for compounds that enhance human L1 mobilization.

Natsuko Terasaki, John L Goodier, Ling E Cheung, Yue J Wang, Masaki Kajikawa, Haig H Kazazian, Norihiro Okada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An EpigeneticInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Profiling of LINE-1-Related Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Inhibition of LINE-1 Retrotransposition by Capsaicin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Natsuko TerasakiDepartment of Biological Science, Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
John L Goodier
Ling E Cheung
Yue J Wang
Masaki Kajikawa
Haig H Kazazian
Norihiro Okada
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USTokyo Institute of Technology · JPJohns Hopkins University · USNational Cheng Kung University · TW

Funding

Training CoreP50GM107632 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BURNS, KATHLEEN H · 2013 to 2017
$10.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM107632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Long interspersed element 1 (LINE1 or L1) retrotransposon constitutes 17% of the human genome. There are currently 80-100 human L1 elements that are thought to be active in any diploid human genome. These elements can mobilize into new locations of the genome, resulting in changes in genomic information. Active L1s are thus considered to be a type of endogenous mutagen, and L1 insertions can cause disease. Certain stresses, such as gamma radiation, oxidative stress, and treatment with some agents, can induce transcription and/or mobilization of retrotransposons. In this study, we used a reporter gene assay in HepG2 cells to screen compounds for the potential to enhance the transcription of human L1. We assessed 95 compounds including genotoxic agents, substances that induce cellular stress, and commercially available drugs. Treatment with 15 compounds increased the L1 promoter activity by >1.5-fold (p<0.05) after 6 or 24 hours of treatment. In particular, genotoxic agents (benzo[a]pyrene, camptothecin, cytochalasin D, merbarone, and vinblastine), PPARα agonists (bezafibrate and fenofibrate), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (diflunisal, flufenamic acid, salicylamide, and sulindac) induced L1 promoter activity. To examine their effects on L1 retrotransposition, we developed a high-throughput real-time retrotransposition assay using a novel secreted Gaussia luciferase reporter cassette. Three compounds (etomoxir, WY-14643, and salicylamide) produced a significant enhancement in L1 retrotransposition. This is the first study to report the effects of a wide variety of compounds on L1 transcription and retrotransposition. These results suggest that certain chemical- and drug-induced stresses might have the potential to cause genomic mutations by inducing L1 mobilization. Thus, the risk of induced L1 transcription and retrotransposition should be considered during drug safety evaluation and environmental risk assessments of chemicals.

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalGenes, ReporterHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHep G2 CellsHumansLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMutagensOxidative StressPPAR alphaPromoter Regions, GeneticSalicylamidesTranscription, GeneticAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalMutagensPPAR alphasalicylamideSalicylamides

Identifiers

PMID24040300
PMCPMC3770661
OpenAlexW1968566468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.