Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24040264›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

The VHSE-based prediction of proteasomal cleavage sites.

Jiangan Xie, Zhiling Xu, Shangbo Zhou, Xianchao Pan, Shaoxi Cai, Li Yang, Hu Mei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiangan XieKey Laboratory of Dependence Service Computing in Cyber Physical Society, Ministry of Education, Chongqing, China ; College of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Zhiling Xu
Shangbo Zhou
Xianchao Pan
Shaoxi Cai
Li Yang
Hu Mei

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of proteasomal cleavage sites has been a focus of computational biology. Up to date, the predictive methods are mostly based on nonlinear classifiers and variables with little physicochemical meanings. In this paper, the physicochemical properties of 14 residues both upstream and downstream of a cleavage site are characterized by VHSE (principal component score vector of hydrophobic, steric, and electronic properties) descriptors. Then, the resulting VHSE descriptors are employed to construct prediction models by support vector machine (SVM). For both in vivo and in vitro datasets, the performance of VHSE-based method is comparatively better than that of the well-known PAProC, MAPPP, and NetChop methods. The results reveal that the hydrophobic property of 10 residues both upstream and downstream of the cleavage site is a dominant factor affecting in vivo and in vitro cleavage specificities, followed by residue's electronic and steric properties. Furthermore, the difference in hydrophobic potential between residues flanking the cleavage site is proposed to favor substrate cleavages. Overall, the interpretable VHSE-based method provides a preferable way to predict proteasomal cleavage sites.

Indexed as

Computational BiologySupport Vector MachineHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLigandsOligopeptidesPredictive Value of TestsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteolysisResearch DesignViral ProteinsHistocompatibility Antigens Class ILigandsOligopeptidesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24040264
PMCPMC3767653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.