Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24040086›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Previous exposure to an RNA virus does not protect against subsequent infection in Drosophila melanogaster.

Ben Longdon, Chuan Cao, Julien Martinez, Francis M Jiggins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Viruses in LaboratoryViruses · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Innate and intrinsic antiviral immunity in Drosophila.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ben LongdonDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Chuan Cao
Julien Martinez
Francis M Jiggins

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 094664MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune priming has been shown to occur in a wide array of invertebrate taxa, with individuals exposed to a pathogen showing increased protection upon subsequent exposure. However, the mechanisms underlying immune priming are poorly understood. The antiviral RNAi response in Drosophila melanogaster is an ideal candidate for providing a specific and acquired response to subsequent infection. We exposed D. melanogaster to two challenges of a virus known to produce an antiviral RNAi response, to examine whether any protective effects of prior exposure on survival were observed.

resultsIn this experiment we found no evidence that prior exposure to Drosophila C Virus (DCV) protects flies from a subsequent lethal challenge, with almost identical levels of mortality in flies previously exposed to DCV or a control.

conclusionsOur results confirm the finding that 'acquired' immune responses are not ubiquitous across all invertebrate-pathogen interactions. We discuss why we may have observed no effect in this study, with focus on the mechanistic basis of the RNAi pathway.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineDrosophila melanogasterFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunity, InnateInsect VirusesPicornaviridaeReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralRNA VirusesSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID24040086
PMCPMC3770682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.