ArticlePloS one2013
In silico mechanistic profiling to probe small molecule binding to sulfotransferases.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence and computational methods in human metabolism research: A comprehensive survey.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- Role of Conformational Dynamics of Sulfotransferases SULT1A1 and SULT1A3 in Substrate Specificity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Machine learning and structure-based modeling for the prediction of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase inhibition.iScience · 2022Article
- From Steroid and Drug Metabolism to Glycobiology, Using Sulfotransferase Structures to Understand and Tailor Function.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2022Review
- Computational Analysis of Chemical Space of Natural Compounds Interacting with Sulfotransferases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Insights into the substrate binding mechanism of SULT1A1 through molecular dynamics with excited normal modes simulations.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- An activity-based fluorescent sensor for the detection of the phenol sulfotransferase SULT1A1 in living cells.RSC chemical biology · 2021Article
- Mechanistic Insights into the Effect of Ligands on Structural Stability and Selectivity of Sulfotransferase 2A1 (SULT2A1).ACS omega · 2019Article
- The Human Skeletal Muscle Proteome Project: a reappraisal of the current literature.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2017Review
- In Silico Prediction of Human Sulfotransferase 1E1 Activity Guided by Pharmacophores from Molecular Dynamics Simulations.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2016Article
- The impact of ligands on the structure and flexibility of sulfotransferases: a molecular dynamics simulation study.Journal of molecular modeling · 2015Article
- Rational design of small-molecule stabilizers of spermine synthase dimer by virtual screening and free energy-based approach.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug metabolizing enzymes play a key role in the metabolism, elimination and detoxification of xenobiotics, drugs and endogenous molecules. While their principal role is to detoxify organisms by modifying compounds, such as pollutants or drugs, for a rapid excretion, in some cases they render their substrates more toxic thereby inducing severe side effects and adverse drug reactions, or their inhibition can lead to drug-drug interactions. We focus on sulfotransferases (SULTs), a family of phase II metabolizing enzymes, acting on a large number of drugs and hormones and showing important structural flexibility. Here we report a novel in silico structure-based approach to probe ligand binding to SULTs. We explored the flexibility of SULTs by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in order to identify the most suitable multiple receptor conformations for ligand binding prediction. Then, we employed structure-based docking-scoring approach to predict ligand binding and finally we combined the predicted interaction energies by using a QSAR methodology. The results showed that our protocol successfully prioritizes potent binders for the studied here SULT1 isoforms, and give new insights on specific molecular mechanisms for diverse ligands' binding related to their binding sites plasticity. Our best QSAR models, introducing predicted protein-ligand interaction energy by using docking, showed accuracy of 67.28%, 78.00% and 75.46%, for the isoforms SULT1A1, SULT1A3 and SULT1E1, respectively. To the best of our knowledge our protocol is the first in silico structure-based approach consisting of a protein-ligand interaction analysis at atomic level that considers both ligand and enzyme flexibility, along with a QSAR approach, to identify small molecules that can interact with II phase dug metabolizing enzymes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.