Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24039887›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Seroprevalence of antibodies against highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) virus among poultry workers in Bangladesh, 2009.

Sharifa Nasreen, Salah Uddin Khan, Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner, Kathy Hancock, Vic Veguilla, David Wang, Mahmudur Rahman, A S M Alamgir, Katharine Sturm-Ramirez, Emily S Gurley and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Novel Avian Influenza A Virus Infections of Humans.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2019
    Review
  9. A Decade of Avian Influenza in Bangladesh: Where Are We Now?Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2019
    Review
  10. H5 influenza, a global update.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Isolation of H5N6, H7N9 and H9N2 avian influenza A viruses from air sampled at live poultry markets in China, 2014 and 2015.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sharifa NasreenCenter for Communicable Diseases, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Salah Uddin Khan
Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner
Kathy Hancock
Vic Veguilla
David Wang
Mahmudur Rahman
A S M Alamgir
Katharine Sturm-Ramirez
Emily S Gurley
Stephen P Luby
Jacqueline M Katz
Timothy M Uyeki
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research · BD

Funding

Addressing Emerging Infectious Disease in BangladeshU01CI000298 · CI · INTERNATIONAL CTR/DIARRHOEAL DIS RES · PI GURLEY, EMILY · 2004 to 2008
$5.7M
NCPDCID CDC HHS 5U51CI000298NCPDCID CDC HHS U01 CI000298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a cross-sectional study in 2009 to determine the seroprevalence and risk factors for highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) [HPAI H5N1] virus antibodies among poultry workers at farms and live bird markets with confirmed/suspected poultry outbreaks during 2009 in Bangladesh. We tested sera by microneutralization assay using A/Bangladesh/207095/2008 (H5N1; clade 2.2.2) virus with confirmation by horse red blood cell hemagglutination inhibition and H5-specific Western blot assays. We enrolled 212 workers from 87 farms and 210 workers from three live bird markets. One hundred and two farm workers (48%) culled poultry. One hundred and ninety-three farm workers (91%) and 178 market workers (85%) reported direct contact with poultry that died during a laboratory confirmed HPAI H5N1 poultry farm outbreak or market poultry die-offs from suspected HPAI H5N1. Despite exposure to sick poultry, no farm or market poultry workers were seropositive for HPAI H5N1 virus antibodies (95% confidence interval 0-1%).

Indexed as

Agricultural Workers' DiseasesAdultAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesDisease OutbreaksFemaleGeography, MedicalHumansInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureRisk FactorsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID24039887
PMCPMC3764173
OpenAlexW2070650227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.