Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24039616›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2007

Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis Chemical Analysis Working Group (CAWG) Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI).

Lloyd W Sumner, Alexander Amberg, Dave Barrett, Michael H Beale, Richard Beger, Clare A Daykin, Teresa W-M Fan, Oliver Fiehn, Royston Goodacre, Julian L Griffin and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2,783 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,783citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,783 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The chemical blueprint of Trichoderma for next-generation microbial biostimulants.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2,723 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Lloyd W SumnerThe Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK, USA.
Alexander Amberg
Dave Barrett
Michael H Beale
Richard Beger
Clare A Daykin
Teresa W-M Fan
Oliver Fiehn
Royston Goodacre
Julian L Griffin
Thomas Hankemeier
Nigel Hardy
James Harnly
Richard Higashi
Joachim Kopka
Andrew N Lane
John C Lindon
Philip Marriott
Andrew W Nicholls
Michael D Reily
John J Thaden
Mark R Viant

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C519038/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D006422/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D525121/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/00004559Medical Research Council MC_QA137293NIH HHS Y01 OD001298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a general consensus that supports the need for standardized reporting of metadata or information describing large-scale metabolomics and other functional genomics data sets. Reporting of standard metadata provides a biological and empirical context for the data, facilitates experimental replication, and enables the re-interrogation and comparison of data by others. Accordingly, the Metabolomics Standards Initiative is building a general consensus concerning the minimum reporting standards for metabolomics experiments of which the Chemical Analysis Working Group (CAWG) is a member of this community effort. This article proposes the minimum reporting standards related to the chemical analysis aspects of metabolomics experiments including: sample preparation, experimental analysis, quality control, metabolite identification, and data pre-processing. These minimum standards currently focus mostly upon mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy due to the popularity of these techniques in metabolomics. However, additional input concerning other techniques is welcomed and can be provided via the CAWG on-line discussion forum at http://msi-workgroups.sourceforge.net/ or http://Msi-workgroups-feedback@lists.sourceforge.net. Further, community input related to this document can also be provided via this electronic forum.

Indexed as

CE-MSChemical analysisFluxGC-MSIsotopomer analysisLC-MSMass spectrometryMetabolite identificationMetabolite profilingMetabolomicsMethod validationMinimum reporting standardsNMRNuclear magnetic resonanceQuality control

Identifiers

PMID24039616
PMCPMC3772505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.