Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24039590›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2013

Genetic and anatomical basis of the barrier separating wakefulness and anesthetic-induced unresponsiveness.

William J Joiner, Eliot B Friedman, Hsiao-Tung Hung, Kyunghee Koh, Mallory Sowcik, Amita Sehgal, Max B Kelz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neural Inertia: A Sticky Situation for Anesthesia.Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

William J JoinerDepartment of Pharmacology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Eliot B Friedman
Hsiao-Tung Hung
Kyunghee Koh
Mallory Sowcik
Amita Sehgal
Max B Kelz
University of Pennsylvania · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

NEURONAL BASIS UNDERLYING VOLATILE ANESTHETIC INDUCED HYPNOSISR01GM088156 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KELZ, MAX · 2010 to 2021
$3.8M
Molecular and anatomical basis of sleep regulation by SLEEPLESSR01NS072431 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JOINER, WILLIAM J · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Function of SLEEPLESS in sleep regulationR01GM088221 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KOH, KYUNGHEE · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088156NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088221NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A robust, bistable switch regulates the fluctuations between wakefulness and natural sleep as well as those between wakefulness and anesthetic-induced unresponsiveness. We previously provided experimental evidence for the existence of a behavioral barrier to transitions between these states of arousal, which we call neural inertia. Here we show that neural inertia is controlled by processes that contribute to sleep homeostasis and requires four genes involved in electrical excitability: Sh, sss, na and unc79. Although loss of function mutations in these genes can increase or decrease sensitivity to anesthesia induction, surprisingly, they all collapse neural inertia. These effects are genetically selective: neural inertia is not perturbed by loss-of-function mutations in all genes required for the sleep/wake cycle. These effects are also anatomically selective: sss acts in different neurons to influence arousal-promoting and arousal-suppressing processes underlying neural inertia. Supporting the idea that anesthesia and sleep share some, but not all, genetic and anatomical arousal-regulating pathways, we demonstrate that increasing homeostatic sleep drive widens the neural inertial barrier. We propose that processes selectively contributing to sleep homeostasis and neural inertia may be impaired in pathophysiological conditions such as coma and persistent vegetative states.

Indexed as

AnimalsArousalBrainCircadian RhythmDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsHomeostasisHumansIon ChannelsMembrane ProteinsMutationNeuronsShaker Superfamily of Potassium ChannelsSleepWakefulnessDrosophila ProteinsIon ChannelsMembrane ProteinsNa protein, DrosophilaQvr protein, DrosophilaShaker Superfamily of Potassium ChannelsSh protein, Drosophilaunc79 protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID24039590
PMCPMC3764144
OpenAlexW2096100413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.