Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24039576›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2013

Identification of immune and viral correlates of norovirus protective immunity through comparative study of intra-cluster norovirus strains.

Shu Zhu, Doron Regev, Makiko Watanabe, Danielle Hickman, Nissin Moussatche, Desyree Murta Jesus, Shannon M Kahan, Sawsan Napthine, Ian Brierley, Robert N Hunter and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Sdp-SH3b2 domain contained inFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shu ZhuCollege of Medicine, Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Doron Regev
Makiko Watanabe
Danielle Hickman
Nissin Moussatche
Desyree Murta Jesus
Shannon M Kahan
Sawsan Napthine
Ian Brierley
Robert N Hunter
Divya Devabhaktuni
Melissa K Jones
Stephanie M Karst
University of Florida · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Tumor BiologyP30CA125123 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Michael M Ittmann · 2007 to 2026
$73.9M
Lack of protective immunity to murine norovirus infectionR01AI081921 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI KARST, STEPHANIE M · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C007034/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G008205/1NCI NIH HHS P30 CA125123NIAID NIH HHS 5R01AI081921-05NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI081921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether or not primary norovirus infections induce protective immunity has become a controversial issue, potentially confounded by the comparison of data from genetically distinct norovirus strains. Early human volunteer studies performed with a norovirus-positive inoculum initially led to the conclusion that primary infection does not generate long-term, protective immunity. More recently though, the epidemiological pattern of norovirus pandemics has led to the extrapolation that primary norovirus infection induces herd immunity. While these are seemingly discordant observations, they may in fact reflect virus strain-, cluster-, or genogroup-specific differences in protective immunity induction. Here, we report that highly genetically related intra-cluster murine norovirus strains differ dramatically in their ability to induce a protective immune response: Primary MNV-3 infection induced robust and cross-reactive protection, whereas primary MNV-1 infection induced modest homotypic and no heterotypic protection. In addition to this fundamental observation that intra-cluster norovirus strains display remarkable differences in protective immunity induction, we report three additional important observations relevant to norovirus:host interactions. First, antibody and CD4⁺ T cells are essential to controlling secondary norovirus infections. Second, the viral minor structural protein VP2 regulates the maturation of antigen presenting cells and protective immunity induction in a virus strain-specific manner, pointing to a mechanism by which MNV-1 may prevent the stimulation of memory immune responses. Third, VF1-mediated regulation of cytokine induction also correlates with protective immunity induction. Thus, two highly genetically-related norovirus strains displayed striking differences in induction of protective immune responses, strongly suggesting that the interpretation of norovirus immunity and vaccine studies must consider potential virus strain-specific effects. Moreover, we have identified immune (antibody and CD4⁺ T cells) and viral (VP2 and possibly VF1) correlates of norovirus protective immunity. These findings have significant implications for our understanding of norovirus immunity during primary infections as well as the development of new norovirus vaccines.

Indexed as

Immunologic MemoryAnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsCaliciviridae InfectionsCapsid ProteinsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell LineCytokinesHumansMiceMice, KnockoutNorovirusSpecies SpecificityViral VaccinesCapsid ProteinsCytokinesViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID24039576
PMCPMC3764223
OpenAlexW2024948981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.