ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
The next generation of transcription factor binding site prediction.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
108 citing papers in PubMed.
- FABIAN-variant 2026: improved prediction of the effects of DNA variants on transcription factor binding.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding Sites in the Long Control Region Across Human Papillomavirus Types.Viruses · 2026Article
- Integrating protein and DNA embeddings for improving genome-wide transcription factor binding site prediction.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A systematic guide for identifying transcription factors that directly regulate the expression of a gene of interest.Genome research · 2026Review
- How negative sampling shapes the performance of transcription factor binding site prediction models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- JASPAR 2026: expansion of transcription factor binding profiles and integration of deep learning models.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Ultra-fast variant effect prediction using biophysical transcription factor binding models.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Systematic identification of disease-causing promoter and untranslated region variants in 8040 undiagnosed individuals with rare disease.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- The evaluation of transcription factor binding site prediction tools in human and Arabidopsis genomes.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Alternative splicing is coupled to gene expression in a subset of variably expressed genes.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- A statistical approach for identifying single nucleotide variants that affect transcription factor binding.iScience · 2024Article
- Peak Scores Significantly Depend on the Relationships between Contextual Signals in ChIP-Seq Peaks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Harnessing regulatory networks in Actinobacteria for natural product discovery.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Review
- JASPAR 2024: 20th anniversary of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- HOCOMOCO in 2024: a rebuild of the curated collection of binding models for human and mouse transcription factors.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Position Weight Matrix or Acyclic Probabilistic Finite Automaton: Which model to use? A decision rule inferred for the prediction of transcription factor binding sites.Genetics and molecular biology · 2024Article
- Discovery of a non-canonical GRHL1 binding site using deep convolutional and recurrent neural networks.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Identifying promoter sequence architectures via a chunking-based algorithm using non-negative matrix factorisation.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Widespread effects of DNA methylation and intra-motif dependencies revealed by novel transcription factor binding models.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Alternative splicing is coupled to gene expression in a subset of variably expressed genes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Finding where transcription factors (TFs) bind to the DNA is of key importance to decipher gene regulation at a transcriptional level. Classically, computational prediction of TF binding sites (TFBSs) is based on basic position weight matrices (PWMs) which quantitatively score binding motifs based on the observed nucleotide patterns in a set of TFBSs for the corresponding TF. Such models make the strong assumption that each nucleotide participates independently in the corresponding DNA-protein interaction and do not account for flexible length motifs. We introduce transcription factor flexible models (TFFMs) to represent TF binding properties. Based on hidden Markov models, TFFMs are flexible, and can model both position interdependence within TFBSs and variable length motifs within a single dedicated framework. The availability of thousands of experimentally validated DNA-TF interaction sequences from ChIP-seq allows for the generation of models that perform as well as PWMs for stereotypical TFs and can improve performance for TFs with flexible binding characteristics. We present a new graphical representation of the motifs that convey properties of position interdependence. TFFMs have been assessed on ChIP-seq data sets coming from the ENCODE project, revealing that they can perform better than both PWMs and the dinucleotide weight matrix extension in discriminating ChIP-seq from background sequences. Under the assumption that ChIP-seq signal values are correlated with the affinity of the TF-DNA binding, we find that TFFM scores correlate with ChIP-seq peak signals. Moreover, using available TF-DNA affinity measurements for the Max TF, we demonstrate that TFFMs constructed from ChIP-seq data correlate with published experimentally measured DNA-binding affinities. Finally, TFFMs allow for the straightforward computation of an integrated TF occupancy score across a sequence. These results demonstrate the capacity of TFFMs to accurately model DNA-protein interactions, while providing a single unified framework suitable for the next generation of TFBS prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.