ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013
Doxorubicin-eluting bead vs conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transarterial strategies for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Conventional transarterial chemoembolization vs microsphere embolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Is DEB-TACE as locoregional therapy before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma effective?BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization as neoadjuvant therapy pre-liver transplantation for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- Role of Pretransplant Treatments for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Waiting for Liver Transplantation.Cancers · 2022Review
- Rabbit VX2 Liver Tumor Model: A Review of Clinical, Biology, Histology, and Tumor Microenvironment Characteristics.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for definitive treatment and as a bridge to liver transplantation in early stage inoperable Hepatocellular carcinoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017Article
- Transarterial chemoembolization using 40 µm drug eluting beads for hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of radiology · 2017Article
- Loco-regional therapies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation: Selecting an optimal therapy.World journal of transplantation · 2016Review
- Advances in transarterial therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: is novel technology leading to better outcomes?Hepatic oncology · 2016Review
- Hepatocellular carcinoma: Where are we?World journal of experimental medicine · 2016Review
- Bridging and downstaging therapy in patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma waiting on the list of liver transplantation.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2016Review
- Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization as an examination method for hepatocellular carcinoma undetected by B-mode ultrasound, computed tomography and digital subtratcion angiography: A case report.Oncology letters · 2015Article
- Transarterial chemoembolization: Evidences from the literature and applications in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.World journal of hepatology · 2015Review
- Downstaging disease in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma outside up-to-seven criteria: Strategies using degradable starch microspheres transcatheter arterial chemo-embolization.World journal of hepatology · 2015Article
- Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2015Review
- Strategies to improve outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving a liver transplantation.World journal of hepatology · 2015Review
- Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with HepaSphere™.Hepatic oncology · 2015Review
- A lethal complication after transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads for hepatocellular carcinoma.Case reports in surgery · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the possible effect of two different types of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) on recurrence-free survival after liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to analyze the effects of TACE on tumor histology.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the histological features of 130 HCC nodules in 63 native livers removed at transplantation. Patients who received any other type of treatment such as radiofrequency tumor ablation, percutaneous ethanol ablation or who were not treated at all were excluded. All patients in the present study were within the Milan Criteria at the last imaging findings before transplantation. Doxorubicin-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) was performed in 22 patients (38 nodules), and conventional TACE (c-TACE) in 16 (25 nodules). Patients' and tumors' characteristics were retrospectively reviewed. We performed a per-nodule analysis of the explanted livers to establish the mean percentage of necrosis of any nodule treated by TACE (conventional or DEB) and a per-patient analysis to establish the percentage of necrosis in the cumulative tumor area, including 21 nodules not reached by TACE. Inflammatory and fibrotic changes in the tissue surrounding the tumor nodule were analyzed and categorized as poor/absent, moderate and enhanced reaction. Uni- and multivariate analysis of risk factors for HCC-recurrence were performed.
resultsThe number and diameter of the nodules, the time spent on the waiting list and the number of treatments were similar in the two groups. A trend towards higher appropriate response rates (necrosis ≥ 90%) was observed in the DEB-TACE group (44.7% vs 32.0%, P = 0.2834). The mean percentage of necrosis in the cumulative tumor area was 58.8% ± 36.6% in the DEB-TACE group and 50.2% ± 38.1% in the c-TACE group (P = 0.4856). Fibrotic and inflammatory reactions surrounding the tumor nodule were markedly more common in the DEB-TACE group (P < 0.0001, for both the parameters). The three-year recurrence-free survival was higher in DEB-TACE-treated patients than in conventionally treated patients (87.4% vs 61.5%, P = 0.0493). Other factors affecting recurrence-free survival included viable tumor beyond Milan Criteria on histopathological examination, the percentage of necrosis on CTA ≤ 50% and a pre-transplant serum α-fetoprotein level greater than 70 ng/mL. On multivariate analysis, the lack of treatment with DEB-TACE, high levels of α-fetoprotein and viable tumor beyond Milan Criteria at histology examination were identified as independent predictors of tumor recurrence.
conclusionDEB-TACE can effectively promote tumor necrosis and improves recurrence-free survival after LT in HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.