Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24038736›Full record

Trial reportPediatric blood & cancer2014

Outcome of patients with Stage II/favorable histology Wilms tumor with and without local tumor spill: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group.

Daniel M Green, Norman E Breslow, Giulio J D'Angio, Marcio H Malogolowkin, Michael L Ritchey, Audrey E Evans, J Bruce Beckwith, Elizabeth J Perlman, Robert C Shamberger, Susan Peterson and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Stage III Favorable-Histology Wilms Tumor: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Study AREN0532.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Pediatric oncologic endosurgery.International journal of surgery. Oncology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel M GreenDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Norman E Breslow
Giulio J D'Angio
Marcio H Malogolowkin
Michael L Ritchey
Audrey E Evans
J Bruce Beckwith
Elizabeth J Perlman
Robert C Shamberger
Susan Peterson
Paul E Grundy
Jeffrey S Dome
Patrick R M Thomas
John A Kalapurakal
Loma Linda University · USLurie Children's Hospital · USAlberta Health Services · CABoston Children's Hospital · USChildren's Cancer Center · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USChildren's National · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USPhoenix Children's Hospital · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Late Effects of Treatment in Wilms Tumor Survivors and OffspringR01CA054498 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LEISENRING, WENDY M · 1991 to 2017
$13.8M
NWTSG Foreign AccrualU10CA042326 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI GREEN, DANIEL MICHAEL · 1985 to 2003
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA-42326NCI NIH HHS CA-54498NCI NIH HHS R01 CA054498NCI NIH HHS U10 CA042326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntra-operative tumor spill increases the risk of local recurrence of Wilms tumor, and adversely impacts relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates.

methodsSurgical checklists, operative notes, institutional pathology reports, central pathology review and flow sheets of 602 patients registered between August 1986 and September 1994 on National Wilms Tumor Study-4 as randomized, followed or switched and coded as Final Stage II, favorable histology (FH) were reviewed. RFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using the Cox model and tested for statistical significance by the log-rank test.

resultsFour hundred ninety-nine patients were found after review to have Stage II, FH Wilms tumor. The 8-year RFS percentages were 85.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81.1%, 88.1%) for those with no spill compared to 75.7% (65.8%, 83.2%) for those with spill. The 8-year OS percentages were 95.6% (93.1%, 97.3%) for those with no spill compared to 90.3% (82.2%, 94.9%) for those with spill. The HR for relapse among those with spill was 1.55 ((95%CI: 0.97,2.51), P = 0.067) and the HR for death was 1.94 ((0.92,4.09), P = 0.077).

conclusionsRFS and OS were lower for patients who had intra-operative tumor spill. The majority of NWTS Stage II, FH patients with intra-operative tumor spill have an overall excellent outcome when treated with two drug chemotherapy (vincristine and actinomycin D) and no abdominal irradiation.

Indexed as

Neoplasm SeedingAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyDactinomycinDisease-Free SurvivalHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingNephrectomyRadiotherapyTreatment OutcomeVincristineWilms TumorDactinomycinVincristineactinomycin Ddoxorubicinoncologyradiation therapyvincristineWilms tumor

Identifiers

PMID24038736
PMCPMC3933291
OpenAlexW1942082802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.