Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24038219›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2013

Trends in prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance in Thailand 2009-2010.

Sayompoo Sanguansittianant, Nattakarn Nooroon, Poonlaph Phaengchomduan, Palanee Ammaranond

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sayompoo SanguansittianantGraduate Program in Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nattakarn Nooroon
Poonlaph Phaengchomduan
Palanee Ammaranond

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment failure of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infection is increasing due to development of viral resistance. Trends of resistance-associated mutation lead to the ineffective treatment in HIV-infected individuals.

methodsExtracted viral RNA from HIV-infected subjects in 2009 to 2010 was performed. The genotypic resistance testing was investigated for HIV-1 drug resistance in RT and PR genes. Frequencies of mutation were compared by a Fischer's exact test.

resultsThree hundred and sixty-nine samples (147 in 2009 and 222 in 2010) were genotyped. At least one mutation was found in 90.8% (335/369) in PR gene and 87.0% (321/369) in RT gene. Three sequences in PR gene, M36I, H69K, and L90M, were decreased significantly in 2010 when compared to 2009. Mutations associated with resistance to nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI's) were found in 61.0% and 64.2% in nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI's). A total of 49.6% was found in combined NRTI and NNRTI. In 2010, M41L was increased significantly from 7.5% to 14.9%. However, there was a decrease in the frequency of the mutations at position 67, 70, and 184 between 2009 and 2010.

conclusionsIn 2010, three mutations in PR gene, M36I, H69K, and L90M, were decreased significantly. However, only one mutation in RT gene, M41L was significantly increased.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveDrug Resistance, ViralFemaleGene FrequencyGenotypeHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedMutationMutation RateAnti-HIV AgentsReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsRNA, Viraldrug resistanceHIVprevalence

Identifiers

PMID24038219
PMCPMC6807551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.