Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24038210›Full record

ReviewAnnals of neurology2013

New innovations: therapeutic opportunities for intellectual disabilities.

Jonathan D Picker, Christopher A Walsh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Healthcare and Societal Costs of Familial Intellectual Disability.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  6. Life science alliance · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Genetic Approaches to Understanding Psychiatric Disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan D PickerDivision of Genetics, Boston Children's Hospital, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, MA; Departments of Pediatrics and Neurology,, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Christopher A Walsh

Funding

Cell Identity Determination In Human Brain: Somatic Mutation and Cell LineageR01NS032457 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Alice Eunjung Lee, Christopher A. Walsh · 1995 to 2026
$12.7M
HUMAN EPILEPSY GENETICS--NEURONAL MIGRATION DISORDERSR01NS035129 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WALSH, CHRISTOPHER A. · 1997 to 2023
$9.5M
Finding Autism Genes by Genomic Copy Number AnalysisR01MH083565 · NIMH · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WALSH, CHRISTOPHER A. · 2007 to 2016
$6.9M
Human autism genetics and activity dependent gene activationRC2MH089952 · NIMH · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WALSH, CHRISTOPHER A. · 2009 to 2010
$5.1M
Somatic mutations in epilepsy: whole genome sequence analysis of single neuronsR01NS079277 · NINDS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI WALSH, CHRISTOPHER A. · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIMH NIH HHS 1RC2MH089952NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083565NIMH NIH HHS RC2 MH089952NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS032457NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035129NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS079277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intellectual disability is common and is associated with significant morbidity. Until the latter half of the 20th century, there were no efficacious treatments. Following initial breakthroughs associated with newborn screening and metabolic corrections, little progress was made until recently. With improved understanding of genetic and cellular mechanisms, novel treatment options are beginning to appear for a number of specific conditions. Fragile X and tuberous sclerosis offer paradigms for the development of targeted therapeutics, but advances in understanding of other disorders such as Down syndrome and Rett syndrome, for example, are also resulting in promising treatment directions. In addition, better understanding of the underlying neurobiology is leading to novel developments in enzyme replacement for storage disorders and adjunctive therapies for metabolic disorders, as well as potentially more generalizable approaches that target dysfunctional cell regulation via RNA and chromatin. Physiologic therapies, including deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation, offer yet another direction to enhance cognitive functioning. Current options and evolving opportunities for the intellectually disabled are reviewed and exemplified.

Indexed as

Fragile X SyndromeHumansIntellectual DisabilityRett SyndromeTuberous Sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID24038210
PMCPMC3876407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.