ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2014
Inverse finite-element modeling for tissue parameter identification using a rolling indentation probe.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human airway material characterization via inverse finite element analysis and neural network surrogate.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
- FEM-Based Estimation-Correction with Minimal Indentation Set for Internal Cavity Classification and Geometry Estimation in Deformable Objects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Iterative Method for Estimating Nonlinear Elastic Constants of Tumor in Soft Tissue from Approximate Displacement Measurements.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2019Article
- Efficient Sensitivity Based Reconstruction Technique to Accomplish Breast Hyperelastic Elastography.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- Using visual cues to enhance haptic feedback for palpation on virtual model of soft tissue.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This paper investigates the use of inverse finite-element modeling (IFEM)-based methods for tissue parameter identification using a rolling indentation probe for surgical palpation. An IFEM-based algorithm is proposed for tissue parameter identification through uniaxial indentation. IFEM-based algorithms are also created for locating and identifying the properties of an embedded tumor through rolling indentation of the soft tissue. Two types of parameter identification for the tissue tumor are investigated (1) identifying the stiffness (μ) of a tumor at a known depth and (2) estimating the depth of the tumor (D) with known mechanical properties. The efficiency of proposed methods has been evaluated through silicone and porcine kidney experiments for both uniaxial indentation and rolling indentation. The results show that both of the proposed IFEM methods for uniaxial indentation and rolling indentation have good robustness and can rapidly converge to the correct results. The tissue properties estimated using the developed method are generic and in good agreement with results obtained from standard material tests. The estimation error of μ through uniaxial indentation is below 3 % for both silicone and kidney; the estimation error of μ for the tumor through rolling indentation is 7-9 %. The estimation error of D through rolling indentation is 1-2 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.