Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24037385›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2014

Inverse finite-element modeling for tissue parameter identification using a rolling indentation probe.

Hongbin Liu, Kiattisak Sangpradit, Min Li, Prokar Dasgupta, Kaspar Althoefer, Lakmal D Seneviratne

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongbin LiuDepartment of Informatics, Centre for Robotics Research, King's College London, London, UK, hongbin.liu@kcl.ac.uk.
Kiattisak Sangpradit
Min Li
Prokar Dasgupta
Kaspar Althoefer
Lakmal D Seneviratne
King's College London · GBGuy's Hospital · GBRajamangala University of Technology · TH

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J006742/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of inverse finite-element modeling (IFEM)-based methods for tissue parameter identification using a rolling indentation probe for surgical palpation. An IFEM-based algorithm is proposed for tissue parameter identification through uniaxial indentation. IFEM-based algorithms are also created for locating and identifying the properties of an embedded tumor through rolling indentation of the soft tissue. Two types of parameter identification for the tissue tumor are investigated (1) identifying the stiffness (μ) of a tumor at a known depth and (2) estimating the depth of the tumor (D) with known mechanical properties. The efficiency of proposed methods has been evaluated through silicone and porcine kidney experiments for both uniaxial indentation and rolling indentation. The results show that both of the proposed IFEM methods for uniaxial indentation and rolling indentation have good robustness and can rapidly converge to the correct results. The tissue properties estimated using the developed method are generic and in good agreement with results obtained from standard material tests. The estimation error of μ through uniaxial indentation is below 3 % for both silicone and kidney; the estimation error of μ for the tumor through rolling indentation is 7-9 %. The estimation error of D through rolling indentation is 1-2 mm.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisAlgorithmsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaPalpationStress, MechanicalSwine

Identifiers

PMID24037385
OpenAlexW1978293480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.