Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24037288›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo

Serological survey of Ehrlichia species in dogs, horses and humans: zoonotic scenery in a rural settlement from southern Brazil.

Rafael Felipe da Costa Vieira, Thállitha Samih Wischral Jayme Vieira, Denise do Amaral Gomes Nascimento, Thiago F Martins, Felipe S Krawczak, Marcelo B Labruna, Ramaswamy Chandrashekar, Mary Marcondes, Alexander Welker Biondo, Odilon Vidotto

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Factors associated with the presence of anti-Frontiers in public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. First Evidence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafael Felipe da Costa VieiraDepartmento de Ciências Veterinárias, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, 58397-000AreiaParaíba, Brazil.
Thállitha Samih Wischral Jayme Vieira
Denise do Amaral Gomes Nascimento
Thiago F Martins
Felipe S Krawczak
Marcelo B Labruna
Ramaswamy Chandrashekar
Mary Marcondes
Alexander Welker Biondo
Odilon Vidotto
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BRIDEXX Laboratories (United States) · USUniversidade Estadual da Paraíba · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this study were to determine the seroprevalence of Ehrlichia spp. and risk factors for exposure in a restricted population of dogs, horses, and humans highly exposed to tick bites in a Brazilian rural settlement using a commercial ELISA rapid test and two indirect immunofluorescent assays (IFA) with E. canis and E. chaffeensis crude antigens. Serum samples from 132 dogs, 16 horses and 100 humans were used. Fifty-six out of 132 (42.4%) dogs were seropositive for E. canis. Dogs > one year were more likely to be seropositive for E. canis than dogs ≤ one year (p = 0.0051). Ten/16 (62.5%) and 8/16 (50%) horses were seropositive by the commercial ELISA and IFA, respectively. Five out of 100 (5%) humans were seropositive for E. canis and E. chaffeensis. Rhipicephalus sanguineus (n = 291, 97.98%) on dogs and Amblyomma cajennense (n = 25, 96.15%) on horses were the most common ticks found. In conclusion, anti-Ehrlichia spp. antibodies were found in horses; however, the lack of a molecular characterization precludes any conclusion regarding the agent involved. Additionally, the higher seroprevalence of E. canis in dogs and the evidence of anti-Ehrlichia spp. antibodies in humans suggest that human cases of ehrlichiosis in Brazil might be caused by E. canis, or other closely related species.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBrazilChildChild, PreschoolDNA, BacterialDogsEhrlichiaFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHorsesHumansMaleAntibodies, BacterialDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID24037288
PMCPMC4105071
OpenAlexW2004256690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.