Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24037278›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2014

The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA.

A Drewnowski, C D Rehm, D Arterburn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence to Discover Interactions in an Ecological Model for Obesity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Lifestyle correlates of overweight in adults: a hierarchical approach (the SPOTLIGHT project).The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A DrewnowskiCenter for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA.
C D RehmCenter for Public Health Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA.
D ArterburnGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Food Environment, Diet Quality and Disparities in ObesityR01DK076608 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DREWNOWSKI, ADAM · 2008 to 2019
$6.3M
An Exploratory Center for Obesity Research (RMI)P20RR020774 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DREWNOWSKI, ADAM · 2004 to 2006
$1.7M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020774NCRR NIH HHS P20RR020774-03NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK076608NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK076608-04NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK020774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the geographic concentration of adult obesity prevalence by census tract (CT) in King County, WA, in relation to social and economic factors. METHODS AND

designMeasured heights and weights from 59 767 adult men and women enrolled in the Group Health (GH) healthcare system were used to estimate obesity prevalence at the CT level. CT-level measures of socioeconomic status (SES) were median home values of owner-occupied housing units, percent of residents with a college degree and median household incomes, all drawn from the 2000 Census. Spatial regression models were used to assess the relation between CT-level obesity prevalence and socioeconomic variables.

resultsSmoothed CT obesity prevalence, obtained using an Empirical Bayes tool, ranged from 16.2-43.7% (a 2.7-fold difference). The spatial pattern of obesity was non-random, showing a concentration in south and southeast King County. In spatial regression models, CT-level home values and college education were more strongly associated with obesity than household incomes. For each additional $100 000 in median home values, CT obesity prevalence was 2.3% lower. The three SES factors together explained 70% of the variance in CT obesity prevalence after accounting for population density, race/ethnicity, age and spatial dependence.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first report to show major social disparities in adult obesity prevalence at the CT scale that is based, moreover, on measured heights and weights. Analyses of data at sufficiently fine geographic scale are needed to guide targeted local interventions to stem the obesity epidemic.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Status DisparitiesAdultBayes TheoremBody Mass IndexCensusesEnvironmentFemaleGeographyHumansIncomeInsurance, HealthMaleObesityPrevalenceSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID24037278
PMCPMC3955743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.