Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24037255›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2013

[Quality and appropriateness of pain medication. Instrument for estimation in nursing home residents].

M Kölzsch, F Könner, S Kalinowski, I Wulff, D Dräger, R Kreutz

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M KölzschInstitut für Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
F Könner
S Kalinowski
I Wulff
D Dräger
R Kreutz
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pain medication appropriateness scale (PMASD) was developed in 2006 in the USA to evaluate the quality and appropriateness of pain treatment in nursing home residents (NHR). This tool can be used to identify potential problems with the pharmacological treatment of pain.

methodsWe developed a German version (PMASD) adapted to the German setting and applied it in Germany to NHR with and without cognitive impairment for the first time. In agreement with the original instrument a test result of >67 % was considered as appropriate pain treatment.

resultsFor the 560 analyzed NHR the average SPMAS score was 39±1,7 (range from -67 to +100). Overall 72% of the study population did not achieve the defined threshold for appropriate pain management.

conclusionsAn appropriate tool for quantitative evaluation of pain treatment was so far not available in Germany. The PMASD analysis showed deficits of pain management in NHR. This tool showed good practicability in Germany and could provide a valuable tool for pain treatment in clinical research and practice.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonHomes for the AgedNursing HomesPractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality Assurance, Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleAnalgesicsAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID24037255
OpenAlexW2223685013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.