Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24037076›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB

Validation of a physical anthropology methodology using mandibles for gender estimation in a Brazilian population.

Suzana Papile Maciel Carvalho, Liz Magalhães Brito, Luiz Airton Saavedra de Paiva, Lucilene Arilho Ribeiro Bicudo, Edgard Michel Crosato, Rogério Nogueira de Oliveira

Open access · diamondAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A systematic review of odontological sex estimation methods.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Analytical Study of Mandible: Prerequisite for Sex Determination.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suzana Papile Maciel CarvalhoDepartment of Social Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São PauloSP, Brazil.
Liz Magalhães Brito
Luiz Airton Saavedra de Paiva
Lucilene Arilho Ribeiro Bicudo
Edgard Michel Crosato
Rogério Nogueira de Oliveira
Universidade de São Paulo · BRFederal Police of Brazil · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledValidation studies of physical anthropology methods in the different population groups are extremely important, especially in cases in which the population variations may cause problems in the identification of a native individual by the application of norms developed for different communities.

objectiveThis study aimed to estimate the gender of skeletons by application of the method of Oliveira, et al. (1995), previously used in a population sample from Northeast Brazil. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe accuracy of this method was assessed for a population from Southeast Brazil and validated by statistical tests. The method used two mandibular measurements, namely the bigonial distance and the mandibular ramus height. The sample was composed of 66 skulls and the method was applied by two examiners. The results were statistically analyzed by the paired t test, logistic discriminant analysis and logistic regression.

resultsThe results demonstrated that the application of the method of Oliveira, et al. (1995) in this population achieved very different outcomes between genders, with 100% for females and only 11% for males, which may be explained by ethnic differences. However, statistical adjustment of measurement data for the population analyzed allowed accuracy of 76.47% for males and 78.13% for females, with the creation of a new discriminant formula.

conclusionIt was concluded that methods involving physical anthropology present high rate of accuracy for human identification, easy application, low cost and simplicity; however, the methodologies must be validated for the different populations due to differences in ethnic patterns, which are directly related to the phenotypic aspects. In this specific case, the method of Oliveira, et al. (1995) presented good accuracy and may be used for gender estimation in Brazil in two geographic regions, namely Northeast and Southeast; however, for other regions of the country (North, Central West and South), previous methodological adjustment is recommended as demonstrated in this study.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsBrazilDiscriminant AnalysisFemaleForensic AnthropologyForensic DentistryHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMandibleObserver VariationReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsSex Determination by SkeletonSex FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24037076
PMCPMC3881884
OpenAlexW2157657004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.