ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2013
Reliability of exclusively NOESY-based automated resonance assignment and structure determination of proteins.
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time-optimized protein NMR assignment with an integrative deep learning approach using AlphaFold and chemical shift prediction.Science advances · 2023Article
- NMR Assignment of Methyl Groups in Immobilized Proteins Using Multiple-BondFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms for NMR Chemical Shift Assignment.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Automatic structure-based NMR methyl resonance assignment in large proteins.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Protein Structure Determination in Living Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Peak picking multidimensional NMR spectra with the contour geometry based algorithm CYPICK.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2017Article
- Improved in-cell structure determination of proteins at near-physiological concentration.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Combined automated NOE assignment and structure calculation with CYANA.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2015Article
- An extended combinatorial 15N, 13Cα, and 13C' labeling approach to protein backbone resonance assignment.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2015Article
- Reliable resonance assignments of selected residues of proteins with known structure based on empirical NMR chemical shift prediction.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2015Article
- Systematic evaluation of combined automated NOE assignment and structure calculation with CYANA.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2015Article
- APSY-NMR for protein backbone assignment in high-throughput structural biology.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein structure determination by NMR can in principle be speeded up both by reducing the measurement time on the NMR spectrometer and by a more efficient analysis of the spectra. Here we study the reliability of protein structure determination based on a single type of spectra, namely nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY), using a fully automated procedure for the sequence-specific resonance assignment with the recently introduced FLYA algorithm, followed by combined automated NOE distance restraint assignment and structure calculation with CYANA. This NOESY-FLYA method was applied to eight proteins with 63-160 residues for which resonance assignments and solution structures had previously been determined by the Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG), and unrefined and refined NOESY data sets have been made available for the Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR project. Using only peak lists from three-dimensional (13)C- or (15)N-resolved NOESY spectra as input, the FLYA algorithm yielded for the eight proteins 91-98 % correct backbone and side-chain assignments if manually refined peak lists are used, and 64-96 % correct assignments based on raw peak lists. Subsequent structure calculations with CYANA then produced structures with root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values to the manually determined reference structures of 0.8-2.0 Å if refined peak lists are used. With raw peak lists, calculations for 4 proteins converged resulting in RMSDs to the reference structure of 0.8-2.8 Å, whereas no convergence was obtained for the four other proteins (two of which did already not converge with the correct manual resonance assignments given as input). These results show that, given high-quality experimental NOESY peak lists, the chemical shift assignments can be uncovered, without any recourse to traditional through-bond type assignment experiments, to an extent that is sufficient for calculating accurate three-dimensional structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24036635What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.