Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24036130›Full record

ReviewHearing research2014

Investigation of musicality in birdsong.

David Rothenberg, Tina C Roeske, Henning U Voss, Marc Naguib, Ofer Tchernichovski

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Accelerando and crescendo in African penguin ecstatic display songs.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Language-like efficiency and structure in house finch song.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Animal Pitch Perception: Melodies and Harmonies.Comparative cognition & behavior reviews · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David RothenbergDepartment of Humanities, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Tina C RoeskeDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Henning U VossDepartment of Radiology, Citigroup Biomedical Imaging Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Marc NaguibBehavioural Ecology Group, Animal Science Department, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ofer TchernichovskiDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: tchernichovski@gmail.com.
City University of New York · USCitigroup · USNew Jersey Institute of Technology · USWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

BEHAVIORAL MECHANISMS OF VOCAL IMITATIONR01DC004722 · NIDCD · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI TCHERNICHOVSKI, OFER · 2001 to 2018
$5.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC04722NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Songbirds spend much of their time learning, producing, and listening to complex vocal sequences we call songs. Songs are learned via cultural transmission, and singing, usually by males, has a strong impact on the behavioral state of the listeners, often promoting affiliation, pair bonding, or aggression. What is it in the acoustic structure of birdsong that makes it such a potent stimulus? We suggest that birdsong potency might be driven by principles similar to those that make music so effective in inducing emotional responses in humans: a combination of rhythms and pitches-and the transitions between acoustic states-affecting emotions through creating expectations, anticipations, tension, tension release, or surprise. Here we propose a framework for investigating how birdsong, like human music, employs the above "musical" features to affect the emotions of avian listeners. First we analyze songs of thrush nightingales (Luscinia luscinia) by examining their trajectories in terms of transitions in rhythm and pitch. These transitions show gradual escalations and graceful modifications, which are comparable to some aspects of human musicality. We then explore the feasibility of stripping such putative musical features from the songs and testing how this might affect patterns of auditory responses, focusing on fMRI data in songbirds that demonstrate the feasibility of such approaches. Finally, we explore ideas for investigating whether musical features of birdsong activate avian brains and affect avian behavior in manners comparable to music's effects on humans. In conclusion, we suggest that birdsong research would benefit from current advances in music theory by attempting to identify structures that are designed to elicit listeners' emotions and then testing for such effects experimentally. Birdsong research that takes into account the striking complexity of song structure in light of its more immediate function - to affect behavioral state in listeners - could provide a useful animal model for studying basic principles of music neuroscience in a system that is very accessible for investigation, and where developmental auditory and social experience can be tightly controlled.

Indexed as

HearingMusicVocalization, AnimalAnimalsAuditory PerceptionBrainEmotionsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePitch PerceptionSongbirds

Identifiers

PMID24036130
PMCPMC3947120
OpenAlexW2013644504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.