Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24035899›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology advances2013

Deconstructing stem cell population heterogeneity: single-cell analysis and modeling approaches.

Jincheng Wu, Emmanuel S Tzanakakis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology advances, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Epigenetics of Aging and Aging-Associated Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Biologically Relevant Heterogeneity: Metrics and Practical Insights.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2017
    Review
  11. Bioinformatics and Drug Discovery.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jincheng WuDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA. Electronic address: jincheng@buffalo.edu.
Emmanuel S Tzanakakis

Funding

Bioprocess for cardiac cell generation from human induced pluripotent stem cellsR01HL103709 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI TZANAKAKIS, EMMANOUHL · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103709NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL103709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isogenic stem cell populations display cell-to-cell variations in a multitude of attributes including gene or protein expression, epigenetic state, morphology, proliferation and proclivity for differentiation. The origins of the observed heterogeneity and its roles in the maintenance of pluripotency and the lineage specification of stem cells remain unclear. Addressing pertinent questions will require the employment of single-cell analysis methods as traditional cell biochemical and biomolecular assays yield mostly population-average data. In addition to time-lapse microscopy and flow cytometry, recent advances in single-cell genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic profiling are reviewed. The application of multiple displacement amplification, next generation sequencing, mass cytometry and spectrometry to stem cell systems is expected to provide a wealth of information affording unprecedented levels of multiparametric characterization of cell ensembles under defined conditions promoting pluripotency or commitment. Establishing connections between single-cell analysis information and the observed phenotypes will also require suitable mathematical models. Stem cell self-renewal and differentiation are orchestrated by the coordinated regulation of subcellular, intercellular and niche-wide processes spanning multiple time scales. Here, we discuss different modeling approaches and challenges arising from their application to stem cell populations. Integrating single-cell analysis with computational methods will fill gaps in our knowledge about the functions of heterogeneity in stem cell physiology. This combination will also aid the rational design of efficient differentiation and reprogramming strategies as well as bioprocesses for the production of clinically valuable stem cell derivatives.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSingle-Cell AnalysisStem CellsAnimalsBiotechnologyFlow CytometryHumansMiceMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesTime-Lapse ImagingFlow cytometryGene expression noiseHeterogeneityHuman embryonic stem cellsInduced pluripotent stem cellsMass cytometryMultiple displacement amplificationSingle-cell analysisStochastic multiscale modelTime-lapse microscopy

Identifiers

PMID24035899
PMCPMC3956452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.