Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24035349›Full record

ReviewThe journal of pain2013

An overview of animal models of pain: disease models and outcome measures.

Nicholas S Gregory, Amber L Harris, Caleb R Robinson, Patrick M Dougherty, Perry N Fuchs, Kathleen A Sluka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of pain, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 210 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
210citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

210 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. ProbioticBrain sciences · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Unlocking the therapeutic potential ofSouth African journal of botany : official journal of the South African Association of Botanists = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir plantkunde : amptelike tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Genootskap van Plantkundiges · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

150 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicholas S GregoryDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; Neuroscience Graduate Program, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Amber L Harris
Caleb R Robinson
Patrick M Dougherty
Perry N Fuchs
Kathleen A Sluka

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007337 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI GEYER, PAMELA K., LENTZ, STEVEN R · 1985 to 2020
$15.9M
TARGETING NF-KB ACTIVATION IN REGULATION OF SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLEP01CA124787 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI REUBEN, JAMES MARTIN · 2008 to 2012
$10.6M
Interdisciplinary Training Program in Pain ResearchT32NS045549 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI KATHLEEN A SLUKA, Yuriy M Usachev · 2004 to 2026
$3.7M
Fibromyalgia Activity Study with TENS "FAST"UM1AR063381 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CROFFORD, LESLIE J, SLUKA, KATHLEEN A · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral PainR01NS046606 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DOUGHERTY, PATRICK M · 2007 to 2015
$3.3M
Role of ASIC3 in the Etiology of FibromyalgiaR01AR053509 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SLUKA, KATHLEEN A · 2006 to 2010
$3.2M
Central Mechanisms involved in the interactions between muscle pain and exerciseR01AR061371 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SLUKA, KATHLEEN A · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
Central contributions to pathobiology of fibromyalgiaR01AR052316 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SLUKA, KATHLEEN A · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS CA124787NCI NIH HHS P01 CA124787NIAMS NIH HHS AR052315NIAMS NIH HHS AR053509NIAMS NIH HHS AR061371NIAMS NIH HHS AR063381NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR052316NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR053509NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR061371NIAMS NIH HHS UM1 AR063381NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007337NINDS NIH HHS NS046606NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS046606NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS045549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPain is ultimately a perceptual phenomenon. It is built from information gathered by specialized pain receptors in tissue, modified by spinal and supraspinal mechanisms, and integrated into a discrete sensory experience with an emotional valence in the brain. Because of this, studying intact animals allows the multidimensional nature of pain to be examined. A number of animal models have been developed, reflecting observations that pain phenotypes are mediated by distinct mechanisms. Animal models of pain are designed to mimic distinct clinical diseases to better evaluate underlying mechanisms and potential treatments. Outcome measures are designed to measure multiple parts of the pain experience, including reflexive hyperalgesia measures, sensory and affective dimensions of pain, and impact of pain on function and quality of life. In this review, we discuss the common methods used for inducing each of the pain phenotypes related to clinical pain syndromes as well as the main behavioral tests for assessing pain in each model. PERSPECTIVE: Understanding animal models and outcome measures in animals will assist in translating data from basic science to the clinic.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalPain ManagementPain MeasurementAnimalsBehavior, AnimalHyperalgesiaNeuralgiaPainaffectiveanimal modelbehaviorcancerescape-avoidanceincisioninflammationjointmuscleneuropathicPainplace preferencereflex

Identifiers

PMID24035349
PMCPMC3818391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.