Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24034963›Full record

Trial reportSocial science & medicine (1982)2013

Effects of an HIV peer prevention intervention on sexual and injecting risk behaviors among injecting drug users and their risk partners in Thai Nguyen, Vietnam: a randomized controlled trial.

Vivian F Go, Constantine Frangakis, Nguyen Le Minh, Carl A Latkin, Tran Viet Ha, Tran Thi Mo, Teerada Sripaipan, Wendy Davis, Carla Zelaya, Pham The Vu and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social science & medicine (1982), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vivian F GoJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 615 North Wolfe Street, E6610, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: vgo@jhsph.edu.
Constantine Frangakis
Nguyen Le Minh
Carl A Latkin
Tran Viet Ha
Tran Thi Mo
Teerada Sripaipan
Wendy Davis
Carla Zelaya
Pham The Vu
Yong Chen
David D Celentano
Vu Minh Quan
Johns Hopkins University · USThai Nguyen University · VN

Funding

HIV/STD Network Prevention Trial in Northern VietnamR01MH064895 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GO, VIVIAN F. · 2001 to 2005
$1.8M
Statistical Designs and Methods for Double-Sampling for HIV/AIDSR01AI102710 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FRANGAKIS, CONSTANTINE E · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI102710NIMH NIH HHS 1R01 MH64895NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, 30% of new HIV infections outside sub-Saharan Africa involve injecting drug users (IDU) and in many countries, including Vietnam, HIV epidemics are concentrated among IDU. We conducted a randomized controlled trial in Thai Nguyen, Vietnam, to evaluate whether a peer oriented behavioral intervention could reduce injecting and sexual HIV risk behaviors among IDU and their network members. 419 HIV-negative index IDU aged 18 years or older and 516 injecting and sexual network members were enrolled. Each index participant was randomly assigned to receive a series of six small group peer educator-training sessions and three booster sessions in addition to HIV testing and counseling (HTC) (intervention; n = 210) or HTC only (control; n = 209). Follow-up, including HTC, was conducted at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-intervention. The proportion of unprotected sex dropped significantly from 49% to 27% (SE (difference) = 3%, p < 0.01) between baseline and the 3-month visit among all index-network member pairs. However, at 12 months, post-intervention, intervention participants had a 14% greater decline in unprotected sex relative to control participants (Wald test = 10.8, df = 4, p = 0.03). This intervention effect is explained by trial participants assigned to the control arm who missed at least one standardized HTC session during follow-up and subsequently reported increased unprotected sex. The proportion of observed needle/syringe sharing dropped significantly between baseline and the 3-month visit (14% vs. 3%, SE (difference) = 2%, p < 0.01) and persisted until 12 months, but there was no difference across trial arms (Wald test = 3.74, df = 3, p = 0.44).

Indexed as

Peer GroupRisk-TakingAdolescentAdultDrug UsersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeedle SharingProgram EvaluationSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSubstance Abuse, IntravenousEvaluationHIVInjecting drug useInterventionPeer networkRandomized controlled trialVietnam

Identifiers

PMID24034963
PMCPMC3938286
OpenAlexW2063142963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.