ArticleChemistry Central journal2013
Bioaccumulation and ecotoxicity of carbon nanotubes.
Article in Chemistry Central journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 310 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carbon Nanotube-Based Biosensors for Non-Invasive Biofluid Analysis.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Pharmacokinetics and bio-distribution of differently functionalized Carbon nanotube in Zebrafish, Danio rerio.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-assisted microbial remediation as a potential approach to groundwater fluoride contamination.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Microscopic anthropogenic waste ingestion by small terrestrial European passerines: evidence from finch and tit families.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative morpho-physiological and biochemical responses of Capsicum annuum L. plants to multi-walled carbon nanotubes, fullerene C60 and graphene nanoplatelets exposure under water deficit stress.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Sustainable nanomaterials: the role of Cyrene in optimising carbon nanotubes dispersion and filtration efficiency.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Article
- Article
- Characteristics and Key Features of Antimicrobial Materials and Associated Mechanisms for Diverse Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Exposure to Oxidized Multi-Walled CNTs Can Lead to Oxidative Stress in the Asian Freshwater ClamInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Oxidative Stress Response andMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Microwave-Assisted Functionalization of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Biosensor and Drug Delivery Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Ultrafast growth of carbon nanotubes using microwave irradiation: characterization and its potential applications.Heliyon · 2022Review
- Functionalization of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Changes Their Antibiofilm and Probiofilm Effects on Environmental Bacteria.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Engineering plants with carbon nanotubes: a sustainable agriculture approach.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
- A workflow to investigate the impacts of weathered multi-walled carbon nanotubes to the mud snail Lymnaea stagnalis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Graphene Nanoribbons: Prospects of Application in Biomedicine and Toxicity.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Low Toxicological Impact of Commercial Pristine Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes on the YeastNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Role of model organisms and nanocompounds in human health risk assessment.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Review
- Carbon-based sustainable nanomaterials for water treatment: State-of-art and future perspectives.Chemosphere · 2021Review
- Antimicrobial activity of functionalised carbon nanotubes against pathogenic microorganisms.IET nanobiotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes (CNT) have numerous industrial applications and may be released to the environment. In the aquatic environment, pristine or functionalized CNT have different dispersion behavior, potentially leading to different risks of exposure along the water column. Data included in this review indicate that CNT do not cross biological barriers readily. When internalized, only a minimal fraction of CNT translocate into organism body compartments. The reported CNT toxicity depends on exposure conditions, model organism, CNT-type, dispersion state and concentration. In the ecotoxicological tests, the aquatic organisms were generally found to be more sensitive than terrestrial organisms. Invertebrates were more sensitive than vertebrates. Single-walled CNT were found to be more toxic than double-/multi-walled CNT. Generally, the effect concentrations documented in literature were above current modeled average environmental concentrations. Measurement data are needed for estimation of environmental no-effect concentrations. Future studies with benchmark materials are needed to generate comparable results. Studies have to include better characterization of the starting materials, of the dispersions and of the biological fate, to obtain better knowledge of the exposure/effect relationships.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.