Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24033988›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2013

The mouse pathology ontology, MPATH; structure and applications.

Paul N Schofield, John P Sundberg, Beth A Sundberg, Colin McKerlie, Georgios V Gkoutos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quilt-1M: One Million Image-Text Pairs for Histopathology.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2023
    Article
  3. Bridging mouse and human anatomies; a knowledge-based approach to comparative anatomy for disease model phenotyping.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Review
  4. Where to search top-K biomedical ontologies?Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrating phenotype ontologies with PhenomeNET.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Geropathology Research Network: An Interdisciplinary Approach for Integrating Pathology Into Research on Aging.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Talking welfare: the importance of a common language.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul N SchofieldDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EG, Cambridge, UK. ps@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk.
John P Sundberg
Beth A Sundberg
Colin McKerlie
Georgios V Gkoutos

Funding

KOMP Phase II Mouse Production and CryopreservationU42OD011175 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LLOYD, KC KENT · 2012 to 2015
$18.9M
Mouse Models of Human Cancer DatabaseR01CA089713 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BULT, CAROL J · 2002 to 2025
$17.5M
KOMP Phase II Mouse PhenotypingU54HG006364 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LLOYD, KC KENT · 2011 to 2015
$16.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089713NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006364NIH HHS U42 OD011175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe capture and use of disease-related anatomic pathology data for both model organism phenotyping and human clinical practice requires a relatively simple nomenclature and coding system that can be integrated into data collection platforms (such as computerized medical record-keeping systems) to enable the pathologist to rapidly screen and accurately record observations. The MPATH ontology was originally constructed in 2,000 by a committee of pathologists for the annotation of rodent histopathology images, but is now widely used for coding and analysis of disease and phenotype data for rodents, humans and zebrafish. CONSTRUCTION AND CONTENT: MPATH is divided into two main branches describing pathological processes and structures based on traditional histopathological principles. It does not aim to include definitive diagnoses, which would generally be regarded as disease concepts. It contains 888 core pathology terms in an almost exclusively is_a hierarchy nine layers deep. Currently, 86% of the terms have textual definitions and contain relationships as well as logical axioms to other ontologies such the Gene Ontology. APPLICATION AND UTILITY: MPATH was originally devised for the annotation of histopathological images from mice but is now being used much more widely in the recording of diagnostic and phenotypic data from both mice and humans, and in the construction of logical definitions for phenotype and disease ontologies. We discuss the use of MPATH to generate cross-products with qualifiers derived from a subset of the Phenotype and Trait Ontology (PATO) and its application to large-scale high-throughput phenotyping studies. MPATH provides a largely species-agnostic ontology for the descriptions of anatomic pathology, which can be applied to most amniotes and is now finding extensive use in species other than mice. It enables investigators to interrogate large datasets at a variety of depths, use semantic analysis to identify the relations between diseases in different species and integrate pathology data with other data types, such as pharmacogenomics.

Identifiers

PMID24033988
PMCPMC3851164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.