Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24033098›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2013

Mechanisms governing the health and performance benefits of exercise.

D Bishop-Bailey

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular origin and biological effects of exercise mimetics.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Primary cilia in satellite cells are the mechanical sensors for muscle hypertrophy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

D Bishop-BaileyComparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
Royal Veterinary College · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/11/39/28890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans are considered among the greatest if not the greatest endurance land animals. Over the last 50 years, as the population has become more sedentary, rates of cardiovascular disease and its associated risk factors such as obesity, type 2 diabetes and hypertension have all increased. Aerobic fitness is considered protective for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, a variety of cancers, joint disease and depression. Here, I will review the emerging mechanisms that underlie the response to exercise, focusing on the major target organ the skeletal muscle system. Understanding the mechanisms of action of exercise will allow us to develop new therapies that mimic the protective actions of exercise.

Indexed as

AnimalsExerciseExercise TherapyHumansPhysical EnduranceReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclearenduranceexerciseinsulin-like growth factormyostatinnuclear receptorsresistanceskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID24033098
PMCPMC3838691
OpenAlexW1860106283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.