ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2013
Effect of eye patching in rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Virtual Reality and Eye-Tracking Assessment, and Treatment of Unilateral Spatial Neglect: Systematic Review and Future Prospects.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy of home based computerized adaptive cognitive training in patients with post stroke cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Effects of Neck Taping in the Treatment of Hemispatial Neglect in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Pilot, Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Trial
- Effects of contralesional robot-assisted hand training in patients with unilateral spatial neglect following stroke: a case series study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2014Trial
- Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke: A Pragmatic Approach to Assessment and Rehabilitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Meta-analysis of the effects of physical activity on ocular biometrics in children and adolescents.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review with Focus on the Visual System.Neurology international · 2022Review
- Number Processing Error as a Clinical Manifestation of Hemispatial Neglect Following Hypoxic Brain Injury: a Case Report.Brain & NeuroRehabilitation · 2020Article
- Brief localised monocular deprivation in adults alters binocular rivalry predominance retinotopically and reduces spatial inhibition.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke: Current Insights.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2020Review
- Neglected-Field Eye Patching Improves Visual Inattention in Hemispatial Neglect: A Case Study.Progress in rehabilitation medicine · 2017Article
- Introduction to the research topic novel insights in rehabilitation of neglect.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye patching (EP; monocular or right hemifield) has been proposed to improve visuospatial attention to the ignored field in patients with hemispatial neglect. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on the effects of EP in hemispatial neglect after stroke in order to convey evidence-based recommendations to clinicians in stroke rehabilitation. Thirteen intervention studies were selected from the Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsychINFO, EBRSR, and Health Star databases. Methodological quality was defined according to the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Overall, seven studies used monocular EP, five used right hemifield patching, and one compared right monocular with right hemifield patching. Seven studies compared normal viewing to monocular or hemifield patching conditions. Six studies included a period of treatment. As to the monocular EP, four studies reported positive effects of right monocular patching. One study showed an improvement in hemispatial neglect with left monocular patching. Two studies found no superiority of right vs. left monocular patching. One study found no effects of right monocular patching. As to the right hemifield EP, one study showed improvements in neglect after right hemifield patching. Three studies found that right hemifield patching combined with another rehabilitation technique was more effective than that treatment alone. One study found no differences between right hemifield patching combined with another treatment and that treatment alone. One study found the same effect between right hemifield patching alone and another rehabilitation technique. Our results globally tend to support the usefulness of right hemifield EP in clinical practice. In order to define a level of evidence with the standard rehabilitation evidence rating tools, further properly powered randomized controlled trials or meta-analysis are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.