Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24031947›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2012

Genetic transformation with the gfp gene of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolates from coffee with blister spot.

Cecilia Armesto, Fernanda Gonçalves Martins Maia, Mário Sobral de Abreu, Antonia Dos Reis Figueira, Bruno Marques da Silva, Fernando Pereira Monteiro

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perspectives of Gene Editing for the Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. TheJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cecilia ArmestoLaboratório de Diagnose e Controle de Doenças de Plantas, Universidade Federal de Lavras , Lavras, MG , Brasil.
Fernanda Gonçalves Martins Maia
Mário Sobral de Abreu
Antonia Dos Reis Figueira
Bruno Marques da Silva
Fernando Pereira Monteiro
Universidade Federal de Lavras · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blister spot (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) is now widespread in most coffee producing states of Brazil, becoming a limiting factor for production. The lack of data relating to the reproduction of typical symptoms (light green, oily patches) leaves a gap within the pathosystem, forcing the search for new methodologies for monitoring the disease. Monitoring of genetically modified organisms has proven to be an effective tool in understanding the host × pathogen interactions. Thus, the present study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of two systems of genetic transformation in obtaining mutants using the gfp reporter gene. Using the two transformation systems (PEG and electroporation) revealed the efficiency of both, confirmed by fluorescence microscopy and resistance to the antibiotic hygromycin-B, when incorporated into the culture medium. The fungus maintained its cultural and morphological characteristics when compared to wild strains. When inoculated on coffee seedlings, it was found that the pathogenicity of the processed isolates had not changed.

Indexed as

Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesFluorescent proteinsPathogenicity

Identifiers

PMID24031947
PMCPMC3768879
OpenAlexW2029438592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.