Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24031905›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2012

Evaluation of diagnostic methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of dyspeptic patients.

Ivy Bastos Ramis, Ernani Pinho de Moraes, Márcia Silveira Fernandes, Raul Mendoza-Sassi, Obirajara Rodrigues, Carlos Renan Varela Juliano, Carlos James Scaini, Pedro Eduardo Almeida da Silva

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Genetic Diversity ofAdvanced biomedical research · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Application of PCR and Microscopy to DetectThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2019
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A Cross-Sectional Study on Molecular Detection ofJournal of global infectious diseases
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Investigation of Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool samples of patients with upper gastrointestinal complaints.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivy Bastos RamisLaboratório de Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande , Rio Grande do Sul , Brasil.
Ernani Pinho de Moraes
Márcia Silveira Fernandes
Raul Mendoza-Sassi
Obirajara Rodrigues
Carlos Renan Varela Juliano
Carlos James Scaini
Pedro Eduardo Almeida da Silva
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori infects nearly 50% of the world's population. This microorganism is accepted as the most important agent of gastritis and as a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma. Currently many diagnostic methods exist for detecting H. pylori, however they all have limitations, thus it is recommend a combination of at least two methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic methods, such as in-house urease test, culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), for the detection of the H. pylori in gastric biopsy specimens of 144 dyspeptic patients, using as gold standard the association between histology and rapid urease test. According to the gold standard used in this study, 48 (33.3%) patients were infected with H. pylori, while 96 (66.7%) were classified as not infected. The in-house urease test and the PCR were the most sensitive methods (100%), followed by culture (85.4%). However, the inhouse urease test and the culture were the most specific (100%), followed by PCR (75%). In conclusion, this study showed that, in comparison with the combination of histology and rapid urease test, the in-house urease test and the PCR presented 100% of sensitivity in the diagnosis of gastric infection by H. pylori, while the in-house urease test and the culture reached 100% of specificity. These finding suggest that the combination of two or more methods may improve the accuracy of the H. pylori detection.

Indexed as

cultureHelicobacter pylorihistologyPolymerase Chain Reactionurease test

Identifiers

PMID24031905
PMCPMC3768872
OpenAlexW1988522361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.