Vibrio cholerae O1 from superficial water of the Tucunduba Stream, Brazilian Amazon.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Non-toxigenicArchive of clinical cases · 2025
   Review
2. Comparative genomics for non-O1/O139 Vibrio cholerae isolates recovered from the Yangtze River Estuary versus V. cholerae representative isolates from serogroup O1.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2019
   Article
3. High genetic diversity of Vibrio cholerae in the European lake Neusiedler See is associated with intensive recombination in the reed habitat and the long-distance transfer of strains.Environmental microbiology · 2017
   Article
4. Environmental reservoirs and mechanisms of persistence of Vibrio cholerae.Frontiers in microbiology · 2013
   Review
5. Population and genetic study of Vibrio cholerae from the amazon environment confirms that the WASA-1 prophage is the main marker of the epidemic strain that circulated in the region.PloS one · 2013
   Article
6. Characterization of Vibrio cholerae isolates from 1976 to 2013 in Shandong Province, China.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as