Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24031218›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2008

Mechanisms and significance of fungicide resistance.

Holger B Deising, Sven Reimann, Sérgio F Pascholati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Novel Antifungal Pyridine Alkaloids from Endophytic FungusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Adaptation of the Phytopathogenic FungusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Rise and Fall ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Lactoperoxidase: Properties, Functions, and Potential Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Fungicide resistance profiles ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Antimicrobial Diterpenes from Rough Goldenrod (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Holger B DeisingMartin-Luther-University, Faculty of Natural Sciences III, Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, Phytopathology and Plant Protection , Halle (Saale) , Germany;
Sven Reimann
Sérgio F Pascholati

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review article, we show that occurrence of fungicide resistance is one of the most important issues in modern agriculture. Fungicide resistance may be due to mutations of genes encoding fungicide targets (qualitative fungicide resistance) or to different mechanisms that are induced by sub-lethal fungicide stress. These mechanisms result in different and varying levels of resistance (quantitative fungicide resistance). We discuss whether or not extensive use of fungicides in agricultural environments is related to the occurrence of fungicide resistance in clinical environments. Furthermore, we provide recommendations of how development of fungicide resistant pathogen populations may be prevented or delayed.

Indexed as

Citrus black spot diseasedisease managementefflux transportersfungicide resistancewheat tan spot disease

Identifiers

PMID24031218
PMCPMC3768401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.