Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24030706›Full record

ArticleThe patient2014

Patient perspectives of dabigatran: analysis of online discussion forums.

Mary S Vaughan Sarrazin, Peter Cram, Alexandur Mazur, Melissa Ward, Heather Schacht Reisinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Pharmacovigilance in the digital age: gaining insight from social media data.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Special Collection Editorial: The digital movement in nursing.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Symptom clusters in women with breast cancer: an analysis of data from social media and a research study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
  20. Literacy disparities in patient access and health-related use of Internet and mobile technologies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary S Vaughan SarrazinComprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center, Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA, mary-vaughan-sarrazin@uiowa.edu.
Peter Cram
Alexandur Mazur
Melissa Ward
Heather Schacht Reisinger

Funding

Building Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research at the University of IowaK24AR062133 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CRAM, PETER M · 2012 to 2016
$594k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR062133NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR062133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2010 the US FDA approved dabigatran, the first new anticoagulant for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) since 1954. To date there is little data that reflects the experiences and perceptions of real-world patients with dabigatran. The abundance of Internet-based discussion forums and support groups related to AF or anticoagulation may provide a low-cost resource for assessing patient experiences.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine patient experiences and perceptions regarding dabigatran through qualitative thematic content analysis of comments posted on publicly accessible virtual discussion forums and Internet support groups. MEASUREMENTS: Comments posted between January 2011 and September 2012 were downloaded from websites focusing on support of patients with AF or on anticoagulation therapy. Comments were analyzed for thematic content.

resultsFive broad thematic categories emerged from the posted comments: general concerns about safety and efficacy, questions about indications and contraindications, questions about proper use and storage, questions about diet and drug restrictions, and experiences with perceived side effects. Our data revealed that a primary concern for patients taking dabigatran is the lack of antidote to reverse the effects of dabigatran if bleeding occurs. Several questions pertaining to the use of dabigatran with other medications or medical conditions were noted, and multiple patients expressed confusion about instructions for using dabigatran before and after medical procedures. An unexpected finding included several criticisms of the medication packaging, which many patients found inconvenient or difficult to open. Finally, several perceived side effects were noted, including some not reported in clinical trials.

conclusionsOnline communities may provide information about topics that are a concern to patients and that may not be discernible in clinical trials, such as medication side effects, proper use, and safety. Our data also highlighted potential topics that may not be a priority to researchers but are nevertheless important to patients (e.g. medication convenience or packaging). Despite the growing use of online health-related communities, very little research makes use of this low-cost resource for identifying patient interests regarding therapeutic treatments to guide patient-oriented research.

Indexed as

PerceptionSocial MediaBenzimidazolesbeta-AlanineConsumer Health InformationDabigatranDrug InteractionsFibrinolytic AgentsFood-Drug InteractionsHumansPatient SafetyBenzimidazolesbeta-AlanineDabigatranFibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

PMID24030706
PMCPMC5029125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.