Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24030677›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2014

Whole-blood viscosity in the neonate: effects of gestational age, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume and umbilical cord milking.

R D Christensen, V L Baer, E Gerday, M J Sheffield, D S Richards, J G Shepherd, G L Snow, S T Bennett, E L Frank, W Oh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. MRI quantification of human fetal OMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2018
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Prevention of the anaemia of prematurity.International journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

R D Christensen1] Department of Women and Newborns, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA [2] Department of Women and Newborns, Neonatal Intensive Care Units, McKay-Dee Hospital Center, Ogden, UT, USA.
V L Baer1] Department of Women and Newborns, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA [2] Department of Women and Newborns, Neonatal Intensive Care Units, McKay-Dee Hospital Center, Ogden, UT, USA.
E Gerday1] Department of Women and Newborns, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA [2] Department of Women and Newborns, Utah Valley Regional Medical Center, Provo, UT, USA.
M J Sheffield1] Department of Women and Newborns, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA [2] Department of Women and Newborns, Neonatal Intensive Care Units, McKay-Dee Hospital Center, Ogden, UT, USA.
D S Richards1] Department of Women and Newborns, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA [2] Division of Maternal/Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
J G ShepherdDepartment of Women and Newborns, Utah Valley Regional Medical Center, Provo, UT, USA.
G L SnowDepartment of Research, Statistical Data Center, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
S T BennettDepartment of Pathology, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT, USA.
E L FrankDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
W OhDepartment of Pediatrics, Brown Medical School, Women and Infant's Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, USA.
Intermountain Medical Center · USLDS Hospital · USUniversity of Utah · USUtah Valley Regional Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Committee on Obstetric Practice recently endorsed delayed cord clamping at preterm delivery. However, the committee report expressed the concern by some practitioners that delayed clamping or cord milking might induce hyperviscosity in preterm neonates. To address this issue we: (1) established reference ranges for whole-blood viscosity among preterm neonates (viscosity reference ranges had previously been reported only in term neonates) and (2) determined the effect of umbilical cord milking at deliveries <32 weeks gestation on subsequent blood viscosity measurements. STUDY

designThis was a prospective study in two Neonatal Intensive Care Units. Blood viscosity was measured using a cone and plate viscometer. Associations were sought with gestation, hematocrit/hemoglobin and mean corpuscular volume. Reference ranges were determined for preterm infants <32 weeks gestation. Then, after umbilical cord milking at deliveries <32 weeks, viscosity was measured at birth and again during the 12 h after birth. In neonates with viscosities >95th % range, we sought signs of hyperviscosity (plethora, hypotonia, hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, thrombocytopenia).

resultViscosity at higher and lower sheer rates were linearly related (n=32, r=0.971). Within the range of hematocrits measured (29-63%) viscosity correlated with hematocrit (r=0.877) and hemoglobin (r=0.853) but not with erythrocyte size (r=0.179). Viscosity was related to gestational age (n=58), primarily due to the lower hematocrits at lower gestational ages. In the 12 h after cord milking viscosity ranged from 3.1 to 9.5 centipoise. Three of twenty preterm, neonates had viscosities >95th % reference range. However, all values were well below those where hyperviscosity is defined in term neonates and all lacked features of hyperviscosity.

conclusionCord blood viscosity is directly proportional to hematocrit/hemoglobin, lower at early gestation and not associated with erythrocyte size. Cord milking at preterm delivery is associated with a low risk of clinical hyperviscosity. Practioners should not refrain from cord milking at preterm delivery because of a concern that it will commonly cause neonatal hyperviscosity.

Indexed as

Blood ViscosityErythrocyte IndicesFetal BloodGestational AgeHematocritHumansInfant CareInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLinear ModelsProspective StudiesUmbilical Cord

Identifiers

PMID24030677
OpenAlexW2002751455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.