Trial reportClinical drug investigation2013
Bioequivalence of canakinumab liquid pre-filled syringe and reconstituted lyophilized formulations following 150 mg subcutaneous administration: a randomized study in healthy subjects.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunomodulating Therapies in Acute Myocarditis and Recurrent/Acute Pericarditis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Biosimilars: A Virtuous Cycle of Sustainability and Innovation.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026Review
- Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Pericarditis: Definitions and New Treatments.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- Risk-Based Comparability Assessment for Monoclonal Antibodies During Drug Development: A Clinical Pharmacology Perspective.The AAPS journal · 2018Article
- Anti-inflammatory panacea? The expanding therapeutics of interleukin-1 blockade.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCanakinumab is a human anti-interleukin-1beta antibody approved for the treatment of cryopyrin associated periodic syndrome currently formulated as a lyophilized powder requiring reconstitution. A new formulation (solution for injection as pre-filled syringe) has been developed to avoid reconstitution.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of pre-filled syringe and reconstituted formulations following 150 mg administration in healthy subjects.
methodsThis was an open-labeled, randomized, single dose, parallel-group study in 130 healthy subjects, followed for 120 days. Subjects received a single subcutaneous injection of 150 mg canakinumab after either reconstitution or in pre-filled syringe formulation, followed by pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics evaluations and safety assessments. The main outcome measure for the study was the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence of the two formulations, which was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of AUC(last) (area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last measurable concentration) and C(max) (maximum serum concentration) were entirely contained within the interval, 0.80-1.25.
resultsThe arithmetic mean values for the exposure parameters C(max) and AUC(last) were similar for the two formulations. The geometric mean ratio (pre-filled syringe vs. lyophilized form) of C(max) and AUC(last) were 0.99 and 1.01. The associated 90% confidence intervals were 0.90 to 1.08 and 0.94 to 1.09, respectively. Most common adverse events were headache and nasopharyngitis. Neutropenia occurred in 2 cases (reported as serious adverse events). No deaths occurred.
conclusionThe 150 mg liquid pre-filled syringe and lyophilized formulations of canakinumab are bioequivalent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.