Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24030475›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of psychiatry2013

The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) task force report on antidepressant use in bipolar disorders.

Isabella Pacchiarotti, David J Bond, Ross J Baldessarini, Willem A Nolen, Heinz Grunze, Rasmus W Licht, Robert M Post, Michael Berk, Guy M Goodwin, Gary S Sachs and 57 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 214 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
214citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
46.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

214 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 744 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Management of adverse effects of mood stabilizers.Current psychiatry reports · 2015
    Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

67 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabella Pacchiarotti
David J Bond
Ross J Baldessarini
Willem A Nolen
Heinz Grunze
Rasmus W Licht
Robert M Post
Michael Berk
Guy M Goodwin
Gary S Sachs
Leonardo Tondo
Robert L Findling
Eric A Youngstrom
Mauricio Tohen
Juan Undurraga
Ana González-Pinto
Joseph F Goldberg
Ayşegül Yildiz
Lori L Altshuler
Joseph R Calabrese
Philip B Mitchell
Michael E Thase
Athanasios Koukopoulos
Francesc Colom
Mark A Frye
Gin S Malhi
Konstantinos N Fountoulakis
Gustavo Vázquez
Roy H Perlis
Terence A Ketter
Frederick Cassidy
Hagop Akiskal
Jean-Michel Azorin
Marc Valentí
Diego Hidalgo Mazzei
Beny Lafer
Tadafumi Kato
Lorenzo Mazzarini
Anabel Martínez-Aran
Gordon Parker
Daniel Souery
Ayşegül Ozerdem
Susan L McElroy
Paolo Girardi
Michael Bauer
Lakshmi N Yatham
Carlos A Zarate
Andrew A Nierenberg
Boris Birmaher
Shigenobu Kanba
Rif S El-Mallakh
Alessandro Serretti
Zoltan Rihmer
Allan H Young
Georgios D Kotzalidis
Glenda M MacQueen
Charles L Bowden
S Nassir Ghaemi
Carlos Lopez-Jaramillo
Janusz Rybakowski
Kyooseob Ha
Giulio Perugi
Siegfried Kasper
Jay D Amsterdam
Robert M Hirschfeld
Flávio Kapczinski
Eduard Vieta
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

CIHRIntramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe risk-benefit profile of antidepressant medications in bipolar disorder is controversial. When conclusive evidence is lacking, expert consensus can guide treatment decisions. The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) convened a task force to seek consensus recommendations on the use of antidepressants in bipolar disorders.

methodAn expert task force iteratively developed consensus through serial consensus-based revisions using the Delphi method. Initial survey items were based on systematic review of the literature. Subsequent surveys included new or reworded items and items that needed to be rerated. This process resulted in the final ISBD Task Force clinical recommendations on antidepressant use in bipolar disorder.

resultsThere is striking incongruity between the wide use of and the weak evidence base for the efficacy and safety of antidepressant drugs in bipolar disorder. Few well-designed, long-term trials of prophylactic benefits have been conducted, and there is insufficient evidence for treatment benefits with antidepressants combined with mood stabilizers. A major concern is the risk for mood switch to hypomania, mania, and mixed states. Integrating the evidence and the experience of the task force members, a consensus was reached on 12 statements on the use of antidepressants in bipolar disorder.

conclusionsBecause of limited data, the task force could not make broad statements endorsing antidepressant use but acknowledged that individual bipolar patients may benefit from antidepressants. Regarding safety, serotonin reuptake inhibitors and bupropion may have lower rates of manic switch than tricyclic and tetracyclic antidepressants and norepinephrine-serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The frequency and severity of antidepressant-associated mood elevations appear to be greater in bipolar I than bipolar II disorder. Hence, in bipolar I patients antidepressants should be prescribed only as an adjunct to mood-stabilizing medications.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesAffectAntidepressive AgentsBipolar DisorderConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansSuicideSuicide PreventionTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID24030475
PMCPMC4091043
OpenAlexW2114807890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.