Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24030441›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2013

Targeting mammalian organelles with internalizing phage (iPhage) libraries.

Roberto Rangel, Andrey S Dobroff, Liliana Guzman-Rojas, Carolina C Salmeron, Juri G Gelovani, Richard L Sidman, Renata Pasqualini, Wadih Arap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Design and proof of concept for targeted phage-based COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a streamlined cold-free supply chain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Next-generation of targeted AAVP vectors for systemic transgene delivery against cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roberto RangelDavid H. Koch Center, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Andrey S Dobroff
Liliana Guzman-Rojas
Carolina C Salmeron
Juri G Gelovani
Richard L Sidman
Renata Pasqualini
Wadih Arap

Funding

Texas Center for Cancer NanomedicineU54CA151668 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI FERRARI, MAURO · 2010 to 2014
$12.4M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Techniques that are largely used for protein interaction studies and the discovery of intracellular receptors, such as affinity-capture complex purification and the yeast two-hybrid system, may produce inaccurate data sets owing to protein insolubility, transient or weak protein interactions or irrelevant intracellular context. A versatile tool for overcoming these limitations, as well as for potentially creating vaccines and engineering peptides and antibodies as targeted diagnostic and therapeutic agents, is the phage-display technique. We have recently developed a new technology for screening internalizing phage (iPhage) vectors and libraries using a ligand/receptor-independent mechanism to penetrate eukaryotic cells. iPhage particles provide a unique discovery platform for combinatorial intracellular targeting of organelle ligands along with their corresponding receptors and for fingerprinting functional protein domains in living cells. Here we explain the design, cloning, construction and production of iPhage-based vectors and libraries, along with basic ligand-receptor identification and validation methodologies for organelle receptors. An iPhage library screening can be performed in ∼8 weeks.

Indexed as

Cell Surface Display TechniquesPeptide LibraryAnimalsCloning, MolecularMammalsPeptide Library

Identifiers

PMID24030441
PMCPMC4309278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.