ReviewOrganogenesis2013
Somatic cell transformation into stem cell-like cells induced by different microenvironments.
Review in Organogenesis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healing of bone defects by induced pluripotent stem cell-derived bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells seeded on hydroxyapatite-zirconia.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- A Concise Review on Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes for Personalized Regenerative Medicine.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Development of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology introduced a novel way to derive pluripotent stem cells, but the genetic manipulation required to generate iPSCs may lead to uncontrolled tumorigenesis of the established cells and thus limit clinical feasibility of the technology. Numerous attempts have been made to date, and alternative reprogramming of somatic cells to reactivate cellular plasticity after differentiation has been suggested. As a result, it had become clear that cell-to-cell interactions and specific acellular environments can be utilized for somatic cell reprogramming. In our previous studies, embryonic stem cell (ESC)-like cells could be derived from transforming ovarian cells and fetal fibroblasts by cell-to-cell interaction or specific cell-mediated microenvironmental factor(s). This cellular event was induced without undertaking genetic manipulation of progenitor cells. Several differences were found between the cellular properties of niche-induced, ESC-like cells and those of genetically manipulated iPSCs and the referenced ESCs. Thus, we provided evidence that terminally differentiated somatic cells either acquire pluripotency-like activity or possess cellular and genetic plasticity under a specific microenvironment and/or cell-to-cell interaction. In this minireview, we discuss derivation of stem cell-like cells under specific microenvironmental conditions in terms of technical perspectives and limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.