Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24029682›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2013

Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability.

Arman Rahmim, Jing Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Synthetic PET via Domain Translation of 3-D MRI.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Voxel-based partial volume correction of PET images via subtle MRI guided non-local means regularization.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2021
    Article
  7. Noise heterogeneity in attenuation-corrected cardiac SPECT images increases perfusion value uncertainty near the base of the heart.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sensitivity ofEJNMMI research · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Time-of-flight in cardiac PET/TC: What do we know and what we should know?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  14. Understanding the impact of advanced PET reconstruction in cardiac PET: The devil is in the details.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for solving the penalized-likelihood SPECT reconstruction problem.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2017
    Article
  17. Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery and time of flight modeling forJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arman RahmimDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Jing Tang

Funding

High End Computing for PET/SPECTS10RR023623 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, DEAN FOSTER · 2007 to 2007
$205k
NCRR NIH HHS 1S10RR023623NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography imaging is affected by a number of resolution degrading phenomena, including positron range, photon non-collinearity and inter-crystal blurring. An approach to this issue is to model some or all of these effects within the image reconstruction task, referred to as resolution modeling (RM). This approach is commonly observed to yield images of higher resolution and subsequently contrast, and can be thought of as improving the modulation transfer function. Nonetheless, RM can substantially alter the noise distribution. In this work, we utilize noise propagation models in order to accurately characterize the noise texture of reconstructed images in the presence of RM. Furthermore we consider the task of lesion or defect detection, which is highly determined by the noise distribution as quantified using the noise power spectrum. Ultimately, we use this framework to demonstrate why conventional trade-off analyses (e.g. contrast versus noise, using simplistic noise metrics) do not provide a complete picture of the impact of RM and that improved performance of RM according to such analyses does not necessarily translate to the superiority of RM in detection task performance.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalSignal-To-Noise RatioPositron-Emission Tomography

Identifiers

PMID24029682
PMCPMC3866837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.