Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24029491›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2013

Establishing polar identity in gram-negative rods.

Brigid M Davis, Matthew K Waldor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Roles for theJournal of biological rhythms · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A bet-hedging strategy for denitrifying bacteria curtails their release of NProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Polar delivery ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The polarity of myxobacterial gliding is regulated by direct interactions between the gliding motors and the Ras homolog MglA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brigid M DavisDivision of Infectious Diseases, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Harvard Medical School and HHMI, United States. Electronic address: bdavis@rics.bwh.harvard.edu.
Matthew K Waldor

Funding

Molecular Biology and Virulence of CTX PhageR37AI042347 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WALDOR, MATTHEW K · 2008 to 2017
$3.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS AI-R37 42347NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI042347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In rod shaped bacteria, numerous cellular components are targeted to the cell poles, and such localization is often important for optimal function. In particular, recognition of poles is often linked to division site selection, chromosome segregation, chemotactic signaling, and motility. Recent advances in understanding polarity include identification of a Vibrio cholerae protein that mediates polar localization of a chromosome origin and chemotaxis clusters, as well as a downstream protein that contributes solely to localization of chemotaxis proteins. In Caulobacter crescentus, the molecular mechanisms by which polar determinants and effectors are localized, and the key roles for nucleotide-dependent switches, have been defined. Finally, roles for, and interactions between, factors that mediate environmentally determined polarity in Myxococcus xanthus have recently been characterized.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityCaulobacter crescentusMyxococcus xanthusVibrio cholerae

Identifiers

PMID24029491
PMCPMC3856201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.