Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24029051›Full record

ReviewAcademic radiology2013

Imaging informatics: essential tools for the delivery of imaging services.

David S Mendelson, Daniel L Rubin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Academic radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. An Evaluation Protocol for Picture Archiving and Communication System: a Systematic Review.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Impact of Imaging Informatics Fellowships.Journal of digital imaging · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David S MendelsonDepartment of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029. Electronic address: david.mendelson@mountsinai.org.
Daniel L Rubin

Funding

Computerized Quantitative Imaging Assessment of Tumor BurdenU01CA142555 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RUBIN, DANIEL L · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA142555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are rapid changes occurring in the health care environment. Radiologists face new challenges but also new opportunities. The purpose of this report is to review how new informatics tools and developments can help the radiologist respond to the drive for safety, quality, and efficiency. These tools will be of assistance in conducting research and education. They not only provide greater efficiency in traditional operations but also open new pathways for the delivery of new services and imaging technologies. Our future as a specialty is dependent on integrating these informatics solutions into our daily practice.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingAcademic Medical CentersDelivery of Health CareHealth Care ReformMedical InformaticsOrganizational ObjectivesOrganizational PolicyRadiologyRadiology Department, HospitalRadiology Information SystemsUnited Statesdecision supportimage sharingPACSRadiology InformaticsRadLex

Identifiers

PMID24029051
PMCPMC4072254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.