Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24028965›Full record

ReviewCurrent biology : CB2013

Building synthetic memory.

Mara C Inniss, Pamela A Silver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current biology : CB, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Molecular digital data storage using DNA.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Synthetic associative learning in engineered multicellular consortia.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2017
    Article
  20. Engineering dynamical control of cell fate switching using synthetic phospho-regulons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mara C InnissDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Pamela A Silver

Funding

TRANSPORT OF PROTEINS IN AND OUT OF THE NUCLEUSR01GM036373 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SILVER, PAMELA A · 1986 to 2016
$2.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular memory - conversion of a transient signal into a sustained response - is a common feature of biological systems. Synthetic biologists aim to understand and re-engineer such systems in a reliable and predictable manner. Synthetic memory circuits have been designed and built in vitro and in vivo based on diverse mechanisms, such as oligonucleotide hybridization, recombination, transcription, phosphorylation, and RNA editing. Thus far, building these circuits has helped us explore the basic principles required for stable memory and ask novel biological questions. Here we discuss strategies for building synthetic memory circuits, their use as research tools, and future applications of these devices in medicine and industry.

Indexed as

MemoryNucleic Acid HybridizationPhosphorylationRecombination, GeneticTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID24028965
PMCPMC3821973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.