Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24028793›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2013

BAIT: Organizing genomes and mapping rearrangements in single cells.

Mark Hills, Kieran O'Neill, Ester Falconer, Ryan Brinkman, Peter M Lansdorp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Progress in Methods for Copy Number Variation Profiling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Structural variant identification and characterization.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2020
    Article
  11. Structural variation in the sequencing era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assembling draft genomes using contiBAIT.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mark HillsTerry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Kieran O'NeillTerry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Ester FalconerTerry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Ryan BrinkmanTerry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada.
Peter M LansdorpTerry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada ; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada ; European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, NL-9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strand-seq is a single-cell sequencing technique to finely map sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) and other rearrangements. To analyze these data, we introduce BAIT, software which assigns templates and identifies and localizes SCEs. We demonstrate BAIT can refine completed reference assemblies, identifying approximately 21 Mb of incorrectly oriented fragments and placing over half (2.6 Mb) of the orphan fragments in mm10/GRCm38. BAIT also stratifies scaffold-stage assemblies, potentially accelerating the assembling and finishing of reference genomes. BAIT is available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/bait/.

Identifiers

PMID24028793
PMCPMC3971352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.