ArticleAccountability in research2013
A brief history of RCR education.
Article in Accountability in research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interventions to promote medical research integrity: a scoping review.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Seeking help as a strategy for ethical and professional decision-making in research: Perspectives of researchers from East Asia and the United States.Accountability in research · 2025Article
- Aligning Scientific Values and Research Integrity: A Study of Researchers' Perceptions and Practices in Four Countries.Science and engineering ethics · 2025Article
- A Taxonomy for Research Intergrity Training: Design, Conduct, and Improvements in Research Integrity Courses.Science and engineering ethics · 2023Article
- Perceptions of Pharmacy Graduate Students Toward Research Ethics Education: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Developing Country.Science and engineering ethics · 2022Article
- The 1-h fraud detection challenge.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2021Review
- Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review.Science and engineering ethics · 2021Article
- Article
- Ethical foundations for graduate students in the psychological sciences.Translational issues in psychological science · 2020Article
- Design, implementation, and evaluation of PINDAR, a novel short program on GCP for academic medical center principal investigators conducting human subject research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- Intervention to Promote Responsible Conduct of Research Mentoring.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
- Mentoring for Responsible Research: The Creation of a Curriculum for Faculty to Teach RCR in the Research Environment.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
- Research Agenda: The Effects of Responsible-Conduct-of-Research Training on Attitudes.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2015Article
- A room with a view of integrity and professionalism: personal reflections on teaching responsible conduct of research in the neurosciences.Science and engineering ethics · 2015Article
- A Modest Proposal to Move RCR Education Out of the Classroom and into Research.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2014Article
- Smart Teaching Matters! Applying the Research on Learning to Teaching RCR.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2014Article
- Rescuing responsible conduct of research (RCR) education.Accountability in research · 2014Article
- Fostering Neuroethics Integration with Neuroscience in the BRAIN Initiative: Comments on the NIH Neuroethics Roadmap.AJOB neuroscienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Responsible conduct of research (RCR) education is now common throughout the United States, primarily in response to federal requirements beginning with the National Institutes of Health in 1989. Despite this long history, RCR education programs remain highly disparate, often with ill-defined content, format, and goals, and minimal evidence for effectiveness. However because it is widely believed that such programs can have value, it is hoped that a review of what is available, and how that came to pass, will highlight what has been done well and where gaps still remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.