Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24027567›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2013

Mesenchymal stem cells in tissue repair.

Amy M Dimarino, Arnold I Caplan, Tracey L Bonfield

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 206 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
206citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02866721 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Phase I, Single Center, Open Label, Single Dose, Dose Escalation Study Assessing the Safety and Tolerability of AllogeneiC MEsenchymAl Stem CEll Infusion in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis-CEASE CF

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterRan2016 to 2020Enrolled14ConditionsCystic FibrosisArmsMesenchymal Stem Cells
NCT04995081 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Single Center, Phase 2, Efficacy and Safety Study of Allogeneic HB-adMSCs vs Placebo for the Treatment of Patients With Parkinson's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorHope Biosciences Research FoundationRan2021 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsBiological/Vaccine: Allogeneic HB-adMSCs, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

206 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Adjuvant Biological Therapies in Chronic Leg Ulcers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Immunomodulatory Delivery Materials for Tissue Repair.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Cancer Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

146 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy M DimarinoDepartment of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University , Cleveland, OH , USA.
Arnold I Caplan
Tracey L Bonfield

Funding

Translational Research in Cystic FibrosisP30DK027651 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DRUMM, MITCHELL L · 1986 to 2014
$15.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK027651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based therapies for clinical therapeutics has been an exciting and new innovation for the treatment of a variety of diseases associated with inflammation, tissue damage, and subsequent regeneration and repair. Application-based ability to measure MSC potency and fate of the cells post-MSC therapy are the variables that confound the use of MSCs therapeutics in human diseases. An evaluation of MSC function and applications with attention to detail in the preparation as well as quality control and quality assurance are only as good as the assays that are developed. In vivo measures of efficacy and potency require an appreciation of the overall pathophysiology of the model and standardization of outcome measures. The new concepts of how MSC's participate in the tissue regeneration and wound repair process and further, how this is impacted by estimates of efficacy and potency are important new topics. In this regard, this chapter will review some of the in vitro and in vivo assays for MSC function and activity and their application to the clinical arena.

Indexed as

adult mesenchymal stem cellsanti-inflammatory agentsantimicrobial proteinmilieu therapyregenerative pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID24027567
PMCPMC3761350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.