ArticleJournal of cardiovascular disease research2013
A clinical scoring system in undifferentiated chest pain predicting undetectable troponin concentration.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular disease research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChest pain is the most common reason for emergency admission to hospital, but the majority of these are due to non-cardiac pain. We sought to determine which combination of clinical features is more likely to predict an undetectable troponin level in patients presenting with chest pain.
methodsWe collected data over a two-month period on consecutive patients presenting acutely to hospital with chest pain and who had a troponin I measured. We recorded basic demographics, risk factors, pain distribution, associated symptoms, physical findings and ECG changes. The parameters significantly associated with troponin positivity were entered into a stepwise logistic regression analysis and the resulting model's coefficients were used to construct a simple clinical score to categorise patients into low, medium or high probability of having a positive troponin.
results26 of 157 (16.6%) patients had a positive troponin. The variables retained in the regression model were: age >65, heart rate >80, previous myocardial infarction, diabetes and pain radiating to either arm. The model showed good discrimination (area under ROC curve 0.869, 95% CI 0.806 - 0.917). Using the regression model's coefficients, patients were grouped into low, intermediate or high probability groups. Being in the low probability group had a negative predictive value of 97.8% and being in the high probability group had a positive predictive value of 65.2%. The majority (73.9%) of patients could be categorised as either low or high probability. DISCUSSION: This simple scoring system, if prospectively validated, may be useful in identifying low risk patients with chest pain who are unlikely to have elevation of serum troponin concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.