Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24027307›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2013

Structure, adsorption to host, and infection mechanism of virulent lactococcal phage p2.

Cecilia Bebeacua, Denise Tremblay, Carine Farenc, Marie-Pierre Chapot-Chartier, Irina Sadovskaya, Marin van Heel, David Veesler, Sylvain Moineau, Christian Cambillau

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. TheJournal of virology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. PBP2b Mutations Improve the Growth of Phage-ResistantApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Cecilia BebeacuaAix-Marseille Université, Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques, UMR 7257, Marseille, France.
Denise Tremblay
Carine Farenc
Marie-Pierre Chapot-Chartier
Irina Sadovskaya
Marin van Heel
David Veesler
Sylvain Moineau
Christian Cambillau
Architecture et Fonction des Macromolécules Biologiques · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Laval · CAImperial College London · GBMicrobiologie de l’alimentation au service de la santé · FRUniversité Lille Nord de France · FR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G015236/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactococcal siphophages from the 936 and P335 groups infect the Gram-positive bacterium Lactococcus lactis using receptor binding proteins (RBPs) attached to their baseplate, a large multiprotein complex at the distal part of the tail. We have previously reported the crystal and electron microscopy (EM) structures of the baseplates of phages p2 (936 group) and TP901-1 (P335 group) as well as the full EM structure of the TP901-1 virion. Here, we report the complete EM structure of siphophage p2, including its capsid, connector complex, tail, and baseplate. Furthermore, we show that the p2 tail is characterized by the presence of protruding decorations, which are related to adhesins and are likely contributed by the major tail protein C-terminal domains. This feature is reminiscent of the tail of Escherichia coli phage λ and Bacillus subtilis phage SPP1 and might point to a common mechanism for establishing initial interactions with their bacterial hosts. Comparative analyses showed that the architecture of the phage p2 baseplate differs largely from that of lactococcal phage TP901-1. We quantified the interaction of its RBP with the saccharidic receptor and determined that specificity is due to lower k(off) values of the RBP/saccharidic dissociation. Taken together, these results suggest that the infection of L. lactis strains by phage p2 is a multistep process that involves reversible attachment, followed by baseplate activation, specific attachment of the RBPs to the saccharidic receptor, and DNA ejection.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsAdsorptionBacteriophage P2BiofilmsCapsid ProteinsLactococcus lactisMicroscopy, ElectronModels, MolecularOligosaccharidesProtein BindingProtein ConformationSurface Plasmon ResonanceVirionCapsid ProteinsOligosaccharides

Identifiers

PMID24027307
PMCPMC3807928
OpenAlexW2131267899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.