Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24027289›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2013

Transfer of cognitive training across magnitude dimensions achieved with concurrent brain stimulation of the parietal lobe.

Marinella Cappelletti, Erica Gessaroli, Rosalyn Hithersay, Micaela Mitolo, Daniele Didino, Ryota Kanai, Roi Cohen Kadosh, Vincent Walsh

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04242680 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Improving Math Deficits in Children With Dyscalculia by tRNS: a Randomized, Double-blind Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBambino Gesù Hospital and Research InstituteRan2019 to 2024Enrolled102ConditionsDevelopmental DyscalculiaArmsBrainstim DLPFC, Brainstim PPC, Brainstim Sham, Cognitive Training
NCT05832060 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparing the Efficacy of tDCS and tRNS to Improve Reading Skills in Children and Adolescents With Dyslexia

TypeinterventionalSponsorBambino Gesù Hospital and Research InstituteRan2023 to 2025Enrolled24ConditionsDevelopmental DyslexiaArmsActive tDCS, Active tRNS, Sham tRNS or tDCS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Boosting Learning Efficacy with Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Intact and Brain-Damaged Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. No facilitatory effects of transcranial random noise stimulation on motion processing: A registered report.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marinella CappellettiInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom, Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy, Department of Psychology, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy, Department of Cognitive Sciences and Education, University of Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy, and Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, OX1 3UD Oxford United Kingdom.
Erica Gessaroli
Rosalyn Hithersay
Micaela Mitolo
Daniele Didino
Ryota Kanai
Roi Cohen Kadosh
Vincent Walsh

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT88378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvement in performance following cognitive training is known to be further enhanced when coupled with brain stimulation. Here we ask whether training-induced changes can be maintained long term and, crucially, whether they can extend to other related but untrained skills. We trained overall 40 human participants on a simple and well established paradigm assessing the ability to discriminate numerosity--or the number of items in a set--which is thought to rely on an "approximate number sense" (ANS) associated with parietal lobes. We coupled training with parietal stimulation in the form of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), a noninvasive technique that modulates neural activity. This yielded significantly better and longer lasting improvement (up to 16 weeks post-training) of the precision of the ANS compared with cognitive training in absence of stimulation, stimulation in absence of cognitive training, and cognitive training coupled to stimulation to a control site (motor areas). Critically, only ANS improvement induced by parietal tRNS + Training transferred to proficiency in other parietal lobe-based quantity judgment, i.e., time and space discrimination, but not to quantity-unrelated tasks measuring attention, executive functions, and visual pattern recognition. These results indicate that coupling intensive cognitive training with tRNS to critical brain regions resulted not only in the greatest and longer lasting improvement of numerosity discrimination, but importantly in this enhancement being transferable when trained and untrained abilities are carefully chosen to share common cognitive and neuronal components.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionChoice BehaviorCognitionDiscrimination, PsychologicalDouble-Blind MethodExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMemoryNeuropsychological TestsParietal LobePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24027289
PMCPMC3771029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.