Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24026778›Full record

SynthesisEuropean heart journal2014

Impact of intracoronary bone marrow cell therapy on left ventricular function in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a collaborative meta-analysis.

Ronak Delewi, Alexander Hirsch, Jan G Tijssen, Volker Schächinger, Wojciech Wojakowski, Jérôme Roncalli, Svend Aakhus, Sandra Erbs, Birgit Assmus, Michal Tendera and 16 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European heart journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.

Ronak DelewiDepartment of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Alexander Hirsch
Jan G Tijssen
Volker Schächinger
Wojciech Wojakowski
Jérôme Roncalli
Svend Aakhus
Sandra Erbs
Birgit Assmus
Michal Tendera
R Goekmen Turan
Roberto Corti
Tim Henry
Patricia Lemarchand
Ketil Lunde
Feng Cao
Heikki V Huikuri
Daniel Sürder
Robert D Simari
Stefan Janssens
Kai C Wollert
Michal Plewka
Stefan Grajek
Jay H Traverse
Felix Zijlstra
Jan J Piek
Academic Medical Center · NLGoethe University Frankfurt · DEMedical University of Silesia · PLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Oslo · NOAdam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FREpatocentro Ticino · CHErasmus MC · NLHôpital Rangueil · FRKU Leuven · BELeipzig University · DEMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMedical University of Lodz · PLMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEOulu University Hospital · FITwin Cities Orthopedics · USUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

Data Coordinating Center For The Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research NetworkUM1HL087318 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI DAVIS, BARRY R · 2012 to 2018
$29.8M
MN Regional Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Clinical Res. Network: From AMI to PADUM1HL087394 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HENRY, TIMOTHY D · 2012 to 2018
$5.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL087318NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL087394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe objective of the present analysis was to systematically examine the effect of intracoronary bone marrow cell (BMC) therapy on left ventricular (LV) function after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in various subgroups of patients by performing a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHODS AND

resultsWe identified all randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary BMC infusion as treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We contacted the principal investigator for each participating trial to provide summary data with regard to different pre-specified subgroups [age, diabetes mellitus, time from symptoms to percutaneous coronary intervention, infarct-related artery, LV end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), LV ejection fraction (EF), infarct size, presence of microvascular obstruction, timing of cell infusion, and injected cell number] and three different endpoints [change in LVEF, LVEDVI, and LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI)]. Data from 16 studies were combined including 1641 patients (984 cell therapy, 657 controls). The absolute improvement in LVEF was greater among BMC-treated patients compared with controls: [2.55% increase, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.83-3.26, P < 0.001]. Cell therapy significantly reduced LVEDVI and LVESVI (-3.17 mL/m², 95% CI: -4.86 to -1.47, P < 0.001; -2.60 mL/m², 95% CI -3.84 to -1.35, P < 0.001, respectively). Treatment benefit in terms of LVEF improvement was more pronounced in younger patients (age <55, 3.38%, 95% CI: 2.36-4.39) compared with older patients (age ≥ 55 years, 1.77%, 95% CI: 0.80-2.74, P = 0.03). This heterogeneity in treatment effect was also observed with respect to the reduction in LVEDVI and LVESVI. Moreover, patients with baseline LVEF <40% derived more benefit from intracoronary BMC therapy. LVEF improvement was 5.30%, 95% CI: 4.27-6.33 in patients with LVEF <40% compared with 1.45%, 95% CI: 0.60 to 2.31 in LVEF ≥ 40%, P < 0.001. No clear interaction was observed between other subgroups and outcomes.

conclusionIntracoronary BMC infusion is associated with improvement of LV function and remodelling in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Younger patients and patients with a more severely depressed LVEF at baseline derived most benefit from this adjunctive therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBone Marrow TransplantationCardiac VolumeHumansMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular Function, LeftBone marrow cellsMeta-analysisST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionVentricular function

Identifiers

PMID24026778
PMCPMC4271100
OpenAlexW2140745397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.