Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24026639›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke.

Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05295862 (Giessen Acute Stroke Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 273 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
273citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05295862 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Giessen Acute Stroke Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of GiessenRan2023 to 2027Enrolled2,000ConditionsStroke, Acute, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions, Critical Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

273 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effect of mobile application types on stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Oral antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  18. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  19. Early supported discharge services for people with acute stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stroke Unit Trialists' CollaborationAcademic Section of Geriatric Medicine, University of Glasgow, 3rd Floor, Centre Block, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK, G4 0SF.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZB/4/784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrganised stroke unit care is provided by multidisciplinary teams that exclusively manage stroke patients in a ward dedicated to stroke patients, with a mobile stroke team or within a generic disability service (mixed rehabilitation ward).

objectivesTo assess the effect of stroke unit care compared with alternative forms of care for people following a stroke. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the trials registers of the Cochrane Stroke Group (January 2013) and the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group (January 2013), MEDLINE (2008 to September 2012), EMBASE (2008 to September 2012) and CINAHL (1982 to September 2012). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials, we searched 17 trial registers (January 2013), performed citation tracking of included studies, checked reference lists of relevant articles and contacted trialists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled clinical trials comparing organised inpatient stroke unit care with an alternative service. After formal risk of bias assessment, we have now excluded previously included quasi-randomised trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors initially assessed eligibility and trial quality. We checked descriptive details and trial data with the co-ordinators of the original trials. MAIN

resultsWe included 28 trials, involving 5855 participants, comparing stroke unit care with an alternative service. More-organised care was consistently associated with improved outcomes. Twenty-one trials (3994 participants) compared stroke unit care with care provided in general wards. Stroke unit care showed reductions in the odds of death recorded at final (median one year) follow-up (odds ratio (OR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69 to 0.94; P = 0.005), the odds of death or institutionalised care (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89; P = 0.0003) and the odds of death or dependency (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.90; P = 0.0007). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the observed benefits remained when the analysis was restricted to securely randomised trials that used unequivocally blinded outcome assessment with a fixed period of follow-up. Outcomes were independent of patient age, sex, initial stroke severity or stroke type, and appeared to be better in stroke units based in a discrete ward. There was no indication that organised stroke unit care resulted in a longer hospital stay. AUTHORS'

conclusionsStroke patients who receive organised inpatient care in a stroke unit are more likely to be alive, independent, and living at home one year after the stroke. The benefits were most apparent in units based in a discrete ward. We observed no systematic increase in the length of inpatient stay.

Indexed as

HospitalizationHospital UnitsPatient Care TeamHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStroke

Identifiers

PMID24026639
PMCPMC6474318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.