SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05295862 (Giessen Acute Stroke Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 273 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Giessen Acute Stroke Registry
Who cites it
273 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Group rehabilitation for adults with acquired neurological disorders: A systematic review of mono- and interdisciplinary interventions in physical and speech-language therapy.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Healthcare professionals' perceived barriers and facilitators of implementing clinical practice guidelines for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review.Clinical rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of mobile application types on stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of anisodine hydrobromide injection for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Prevalence and implications of frailty in acute stroke: systematic review & meta-analysis.Age and ageing · 2022Pooled it
- Oral antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for older people with hip fractures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Worldwide 1-month case fatality of ischaemic stroke and the temporal trend.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2020Pooled it
- Chinese Stroke Association guidelines for clinical management of cerebrovascular disorders: executive summary and 2019 update on organizational stroke management.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2020Guideline
- Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- What factors affect clinical decision-making about access to stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review.Clinical rehabilitation · 2019Pooled it
- Very early versus delayed mobilisation after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Activity monitors for increasing physical activity in adult stroke survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Predicting Discharge to Institutional Long-Term Care After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2018Pooled it
- Interventions for acute stroke management in Africa: a systematic review of the evidence.Systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Early supported discharge services for people with acute stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Health professionals' views on the barriers and enablers to evidence-based practice for acute stroke care: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2017Pooled it
213 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOrganised stroke unit care is provided by multidisciplinary teams that exclusively manage stroke patients in a ward dedicated to stroke patients, with a mobile stroke team or within a generic disability service (mixed rehabilitation ward).
objectivesTo assess the effect of stroke unit care compared with alternative forms of care for people following a stroke. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the trials registers of the Cochrane Stroke Group (January 2013) and the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group (January 2013), MEDLINE (2008 to September 2012), EMBASE (2008 to September 2012) and CINAHL (1982 to September 2012). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials, we searched 17 trial registers (January 2013), performed citation tracking of included studies, checked reference lists of relevant articles and contacted trialists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled clinical trials comparing organised inpatient stroke unit care with an alternative service. After formal risk of bias assessment, we have now excluded previously included quasi-randomised trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors initially assessed eligibility and trial quality. We checked descriptive details and trial data with the co-ordinators of the original trials. MAIN
resultsWe included 28 trials, involving 5855 participants, comparing stroke unit care with an alternative service. More-organised care was consistently associated with improved outcomes. Twenty-one trials (3994 participants) compared stroke unit care with care provided in general wards. Stroke unit care showed reductions in the odds of death recorded at final (median one year) follow-up (odds ratio (OR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69 to 0.94; P = 0.005), the odds of death or institutionalised care (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89; P = 0.0003) and the odds of death or dependency (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.90; P = 0.0007). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the observed benefits remained when the analysis was restricted to securely randomised trials that used unequivocally blinded outcome assessment with a fixed period of follow-up. Outcomes were independent of patient age, sex, initial stroke severity or stroke type, and appeared to be better in stroke units based in a discrete ward. There was no indication that organised stroke unit care resulted in a longer hospital stay. AUTHORS'
conclusionsStroke patients who receive organised inpatient care in a stroke unit are more likely to be alive, independent, and living at home one year after the stroke. The benefits were most apparent in units based in a discrete ward. We observed no systematic increase in the length of inpatient stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.