Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24026632›Full record

Trial reportQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2014

Quality of life among hazardous and harmful drinkers: EQ-5D over a 1-year follow-up period.

Holly N Essex, Ian R White, Zarnie Khadjesari, Stuart Linke, Jim McCambridge, Elizabeth Murray, Steve Parrott, Christine Godfrey

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Measuring intangible cost-of-morbidity due to substance dependence: implications of using alternative preference-based instruments.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Web-Based Self-Help for Problematic Alcohol Use: a Large Naturalistic Study.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2017
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Perceived quality of life, 6 months after detoxification: Is abstinence a modifying factor?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2016
    Article
  20. Population norms for the EQ-5D index scores using Singapore preference weights.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Holly N EssexDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Seebohm Rowntree Building, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK, holly.essex@york.ac.uk.
Ian R White
Zarnie Khadjesari
Stuart Linke
Jim McCambridge
Elizabeth Murray
Steve Parrott
Christine Godfrey

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKChief Scientist OfficeDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council G0501298Medical Research Council MC_U105260558Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1Medical Research Council U105260558Wellcome Trust WT086516MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the ability of the EQ-5D to discriminate between levels of alcohol risk in a large sample of hazardous and harmful drinkers, and to explore the relationship between transitions between alcohol risk levels and changes in EQ-5D up to 12 months.

methodsThis is a web-based randomised controlled trial evaluating a novel intervention for hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption. EQ-5D scores were compared among groups of drinkers at baseline (low/medium/high risk according to self-reported past week alcohol consumption), and changes in EQ-5D scores were estimated as a function of changes in alcohol consumption level.

resultsBaseline EQ-5D scores were dominated by problems with anxiety/depression, which increased with alcohol risk level, whilst high-risk drinkers also experienced more problems with physical HRQoL dimensions. However, the tool demonstrated a considerable ceiling effect. At follow-up, despite considerable reductions in alcohol consumption across the sample, significant changes in aggregated EQ-5D index scores were only observed for high-risk drinkers at baseline who reduced their drinking, with small improvements (0.04-0.06) compared to those who did not reduce.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the three-option EQ-5D may not be an optimal primary end point for measuring clinical and cost-effectiveness in randomised controlled trials of interventions among hazardous and harmful alcohol users, although further testing of the sensitivity of the tool in these populations is needed.

Indexed as

Health SurveysAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.